Re: cisco.com unavailable

I've been using it from Oregon, USA all morning without problems. On 9/21/2015 11:51 AM, Murat Kaipov wrote: Hi folks! Is cisco.com unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?

Re: cisco.com unavailable

Now all works fine. mkaipov$ traceroute www.cisco.com traceroute to e144.dscb.akamaiedge.net (23.78.32.170), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 router.asus.com (10.10.0.1) 1.598 ms 1.287 ms 1.126 ms 2 62.182.11.92 (62.182.11.92) 1.878 ms 1.789 ms 1.863 ms 3 91.221.157.1 (91.221.157.1) 3.1

Re: cisco.com unavailable

On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:58:39 -0400, Dovid Bender said: > Working from Verizon FiOS > > [root@yosefh-OptiPlex-3020 ~]# wget cisco.com Somebody's a trusting soul :) pgpp_mxiyGC6X.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: cisco.com unavailable

http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net --- http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric > On Sep 21, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote

Re: cisco.com unavailable

All set for me; East Africa, Kenya, Nairobi .. I can also see some serious dude fixing a bike on the site. Tracing route to cisco.com [72.163.4.161] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.1 211 ms 224 ms13 ms 10.34.0.1 3 7 ms 7 ms 6 ms 19

Re: cisco.com unavailable

2 minutes ago all had worked fine, now I have same trouble. mkaipov$ traceroute cisco.com traceroute to cisco.com (72.163.4.161), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 router.asus.com (10.10.0.1) 1.536 ms 1.232 ms 1.176 ms 2 62.182.11.92 (62.182.11.92) 1.934 ms 2.924 ms 3.251 ms 3 isp2.aquafo

Re: cisco.com unavailable

> Is cisco.com unavailable or it is affected just for > Rostelecom? Works fine here in The Netherlands (ISP: Solcon). Cheers, Sander

Re: cisco.com unavailable

On 9/21/2015 11:51 AM, Murat Kaipov wrote: Hi folks! Is cisco.com unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom? All is well from Cogent, Charter, and Verizon Wireless

Re: cisco.com unavailable

Works from the UK from a few ISP's -- -- Regards, Hal Ponton Senior Network Engineer Buzcom / FibreWiFi Keith Stokes 21 September 2015 19:55 It works fine for me from Cox. --- Keith Stokes From: NANOG on behalf of

Re: cisco.com unavailable

Available in Hungary. Roderick Beck Sales - Europe and the Americas This e-mail and any attachments thereto is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may be proprietary and/or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified th

Re: cisco.com unavailable

On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Murat Kaipov wrote: > Hi folks! > Is cisco.com unavailable or it is affected just for > Rostelecom? http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/cisco.com > It's just you. http://cisco.com is up. ~Marcin

Re: cisco.com unavailable

Is cisco.com unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom? No problems here from either v4 or v6. -- Hugo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: cisco.com unavailable

I had no difficulty getting to it, but it appears that I probably got to an Akamai box: Non-authoritative answer: Name:e144.dscb.akamaiedge.net Addresses: 2600:1409:a:185::90 2600:1409:a:18b::90 23.200.208.170 Aliases: www.cisco.com www.cisco.com.akadns.net

Re: cisco.com unavailable

Working from Verizon FiOS [root@yosefh-OptiPlex-3020 ~]# wget cisco.com --2015-09-21 14:57:58-- http://cisco.com/ Resolving cisco.com (cisco.com)... 72.163.4.161, 2001:420:1101:1::a Connecting to cisco.com (cisco.com)|72.163.4.161|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Move

Re: cisco.com unavailable

Works for me via Frontier, south west Ohio. 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 10.10.10.1 2 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 192.149.254.1 3 7 ms 5 ms 6 ms 45.52.8.205 421 ms20 ms21 ms 74.40.5.58 519 ms20 ms20 ms 74.42.149.189 622 ms20 ms21 ms

Re: cisco.com unavailable

Thanks to all of you. I think there issue with ISP’s connectivity in Russia. > 21 сент. 2015 г., в 21:55, Keith Stokes написал(а): > > It works fine for me from Cox. > > > > --- > > Keith Stokes > > > From: NANOG on behalf of Murat Kaipov > > Sent

Re: cisco.com unavailable

It works fine for me from Cox. --- Keith Stokes From: NANOG on behalf of Murat Kaipov Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 1:51 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: cisco.com unavailable Hi folks! Is cisco.com unavailable or it is affecte

Re: cisco.com unavailable

I get there with no problem. Scott Helms Vice President of Technology ZCorum (678) 507-5000 http://twitter.com/kscotthelms On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Murat Kaipov wrote: > Hi folks! > Is cisco.com unava

Re: cisco.com

2009/8/5 Nathan Ward > On 5/08/2009, at 1:34 AM, R. Benjamin Kessler wrote: > > Hey Gang - >> >> I'm unable to get to cisco.com from multiple places on the 'net >> (including downforeveryoneorjustme.com); any ideas on the cause and ETR? >> > > > CCNAs everywhere panic as their monitoring tools t

Re: cisco.com

On 5/08/2009, at 1:34 AM, R. Benjamin Kessler wrote: Hey Gang - I'm unable to get to cisco.com from multiple places on the 'net (including downforeveryoneorjustme.com); any ideas on the cause and ETR? CCNAs everywhere panic as their monitoring tools tell them that the 'Internet' is down.

Re: cisco.com

On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, h...@efes.iucc.ac.il wrote: a) they were smoking something and indeed decided to use EIGRP rather than BGP. b) they were testing out 4 byte ASNs and had a software issue in their IOS c) someone in Cisco wanted to download a new IOS and got frustrated with their new site so

Re: cisco.com

> Well, Cisco *did* EoS/EoL BGP last week. I guess there really wasn't > all that much industry traction on whatever protocol they decided to > replace it with. > > https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2009-July/062646.html What happened could be: a) they were smoking something and indeed

RE: cisco.com

[cid:image001.jpg@01CA14F5.A289E6D0] From: Matthew Huff Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 11:19 AM To: 'Myke Lyons' Cc: 'nanog@nanog.org' Subject: RE: cisco.com [2]http://blogs.cisco.com/news/comments/final_update_ciscocom_outage/ FINAL UPDATE: Cisco.com O

RE: cisco.com

@01CA14F5.53540A00] From: Myke Lyons [mailto:myke.ly...@cmtww.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 10:47 AM To: Matthew Huff Cc: 'nanog@nanog.org' Subject: Re: cisco.com On Aug 4, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Matthew Huff wrote: Looks like it's back. rtr-inet1#show ip bgp 198.133.

Re: cisco.com

Didn't you hear? Cisco EoLed BGP this time last week. I guess they really meant it! Justin deles...@gmail.com wrote: So cisco has no BGP is that what I'm hearing... Oh the irony :) --Original Message-- From: Aaron Millisor To: R. Benjamin Kessler Cc: nanog@nanog.org S

Re: cisco.com

On Aug 4, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Sam Oduor wrote: http://blogs.cisco.com/news/comments/final_update_ciscocom_outage/ That blog post is from 2007 so I'm assuming this was sent as a joke.

Re: cisco.com

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Sam Oduor wrote: > http://blogs.cisco.com/news/comments/final_update_ciscocom_outage/ Nice, except that the blog entry is from two years ago. What happened _today_?

RE: cisco.com

Cisco is aware of the issue and they are working on it. David Hiers CCIE (R/S, V), CISSP ADP Dealer Services 2525 SW 1st Ave. Suite 300W Portland, OR 97201 o: 503-205-4467 f: 503-402-3277 -Original Message- From: R. Benjamin Kessler [mailto:r...@mnsginc.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 0

Re: cisco.com

Sam Oduor wrote: http://blogs.cisco.com/news/comments/final_update_ciscocom_outage/ I don't think the Kool-Aid powder is blending with the water...that's from (almost) two years ago. pt

Re: cisco.com

On Aug 4, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Matthew Huff wrote: Looks like it's back. rtr-inet1#show ip bgp 198.133.219.0/24 BGP routing table entry for 198.133.219.0/24, version 4296794 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Advertised to update-groups: 1 6128 7132 109, (recei

Re: cisco.com

Up via Sprintlink in London... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

RE: cisco.com

Cisco.com (198.133.219.25) is alive from .au (from ASN7474) Traceroute shows: 9 448 ms 419 ms 389 ms sjck-dmzbb-gw1.cisco.com [128.107.224.6] 10 427 ms 268 ms 279 ms sjck-dmzdc-gw2-gig5-1.cisco.com [128.107.224.77] Did a quick check on a few .au looking glass sites and getting e

RE: cisco.com

See Cisco as Up Qwest, Cogent, Att, and L3 Midwest-US ~J -Original Message- From: Jorge Amodio [mailto:jmamo...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 9:07 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: cisco.com FB up, Cisco down, from SATX (Time Warner Road Runner) J

Re: cisco.com

Cisco.com up again in Italy. Regards, German Martinez ha scritto: On Tue Aug 04, 2009, Jon Auer wrote: See: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2009-August/001386.html I do not have a route to that IP (198.133.219.25) in BGP either.. Route is not longer in the routing table sin

Re: cisco.com

Well, Cisco *did* EoS/EoL BGP last week. I guess there really wasn't all that much industry traction on whatever protocol they decided to replace it with. https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2009-July/062646.html ;p On 4-Aug-09, at 9:45 AM, Aaron Millisor wrote: Not sure the ETA b

RE: cisco.com

, August 04, 2009 7:04 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: cisco.com No route for 198.133.219.0/24 in 22820 from our upstream (3356 and 174). -Scott W -Original Message- From: sjk [mailto:s...@sleepycatz.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 8:49 AM To: Dominic J. Eidson Cc: nanog@nanog.org

Re: cisco.com (back now)

I see it now via 6453 7132 109 174 1239 109 ---Mike Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications,m...@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1

Re: cisco.com

t; Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 8:49 AM > To: Dominic J. Eidson > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: cisco.com > > We have seen the route for cisco withdrawn from 208 and 2828. Facebook > seems fine > > Dominic J. Eidson wrote: > > > > Both work from Austin

RE: cisco.com

ardi 4 août 2009 16:03 À : nanog@nanog.org Objet : Re: cisco.com Missing route on Internap also. Netraft shows cisco.com went down right at 12:00GMT. http://uptime.netcraft.com/perf/graph?site=www.cisco.com On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:48 AM, sjk wrote: > We have seen the route for cisco withdraw

Re: cisco.com

* * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * Could other Sprint routes be affected ? Regards Marshall -Original Message- From: sjk [mailto:s...@sleepycatz.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 8:49 AM To: Dominic J. Eidson Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: cisco.com We have seen the route for cisco

Re: cisco.com

On Tue Aug 04, 2009, Steve Rossen wrote: Route is back 08/04 13:55:57 Withdraw 198.133.219.0/24 08/04 16:04:53 Update 198.133.219.0/24 Times are CET. German > Missing route on Internap also. > > Netraft shows cisco.com went down right at 12:00GMT. > > http://uptime.netcraft.com/perf/graph?si

Re: cisco.com

A 198.133.219.25 so, that sounds like routing to me. BTW, 198.133.219.26 is ping-able from here. Marshall -Original Message- From: Chris Gotstein [mailto:ch...@uplogon.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 8:48 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: cisco.com Seeing same issue from Ch

Re: cisco.com

Seeing them off of Sprint now. . . weird sjk wrote: > We have seen the route for cisco withdrawn from 208 and 2828. Facebook > seems fine > >

Re: cisco.com

http://blogs.cisco.com/news/comments/final_update_ciscocom_outage/ On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:51 PM, wrote: > So cisco has no BGP is that what I'm hearing... Oh the irony :) > --Original Message-- > From: Aaron Millisor > To: R. Benjamin Kessler > Cc: nanog@nan

Re: cisco.com

Can get to facebook but not to cisco from Denver (level 3). Traces reach SJC and die in ATT net. Possibly a local data center outage / black-holing event. - Gaurav On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Marc Manthey wrote: > > Am 04.08.2009 um 15:42 schrieb Alex Nderitu: > > Facebook seems to also b

RE: cisco.com

04, 2009 9:59 AM > To: Jon Auer > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: cisco.com > > Same here in Prague (various upstreams in Central Europe) > > MK > > Jon Auer napsal(a): > > See: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2009- > August/001386

Re: cisco.com

I'm reaching them from Time-Warner in Portland, Maine. 1<1 ms<1 ms<1 ms 10.0.1.10 2 1 ms<1 ms<1 ms rrcs-24-39-42-66.nys.biz.rr.com [24.39.42.66] 3 3 ms 1 ms 1 ms rrcs-24-39-42-65.nys.biz.rr.com [24.39.42.65] 4 5 ms 3 ms 4 ms ten1-1-1.ptl

Re: cisco.com

> From: Aaron Millisor > To: R. Benjamin Kessler > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: cisco.com > Sent: Aug 4, 2009 10:45 AM > > Not sure the ETA but the network that the address for cisco.com resolves > to (19

RE: cisco.com

The IP is back in BGP and the website is working for me now.

Re: cisco.com

On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 09:34:46AM -0400, R. Benjamin Kessler wrote: > Hey Gang - > > I'm unable to get to cisco.com from multiple places on the 'net > (including downforeveryoneorjustme.com); any ideas on the cause and ETR? Instead of the hoot-n-holler line, maybe check bgp? route-views.orego

RE: cisco.com

anog.org Subject: Re: cisco.com Am 04.08.2009 um 15:42 schrieb Alex Nderitu: > Facebook seems to also be affected. facebook works fine from germany > > I'm unable to get to cisco.com from multiple places on the 'net > (including downforeveryoneorjustme.com); any ideas on th

Re: cisco.com

FB up, Cisco down, from SATX (Time Warner Road Runner) J

Re: cisco.com

Hi everyone, same issue from Italy, via Fastweb and Retelit. deles...@gmail.com ha scritto: Facebook up. Cisco down. From eastern canada

RE: cisco.com

No route for 198.133.219.0/24 in 22820 from our upstream (3356 and 174). -Scott W -Original Message- From: sjk [mailto:s...@sleepycatz.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 8:49 AM To: Dominic J. Eidson Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: cisco.com We have seen the route for cisco

Re: cisco.com

Missing route on Internap also. Netraft shows cisco.com went down right at 12:00GMT. http://uptime.netcraft.com/perf/graph?site=www.cisco.com On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:48 AM, sjk wrote: > We have seen the route for cisco withdrawn from 208 and 2828. Facebook > seems fine > > Dominic J. Eidson wro

RE: cisco.com

Same here via Verizon, Level3 and Comcast. Btw... all 3 resolve to the same 198.133.219.25 addr. -Original Message- From: Chris Gotstein [mailto:ch...@uplogon.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 8:48 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: cisco.com Seeing same issue from Chicago via Qwest

Re: cisco.com

Same here in Prague (various upstreams in Central Europe) MK Jon Auer napsal(a): See: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2009-August/001386.html I do not have a route to that IP (198.133.219.25) in BGP either.. On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:34 AM, R. Benjamin Kessler wrote:

Re: cisco.com

On Tue Aug 04, 2009, Jon Auer wrote: > See: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2009-August/001386.html > I do not have a route to that IP (198.133.219.25) in BGP either.. Route is not longer in the routing table since (CET) 08/04 13:55:57 Withdraw 198.133.219.0/24> German pgpMuXvcWuWc

Re: cisco.com

can't get to cisco.com from here atm either, but can get to facebook. looks like facebook is now coming from ashburn, va. cisco dies within level3 for us, and for route-views.oregon-ix.net: 5 eugn-core1-gw.nero.net (207.98.64.161) [AS 3701] !H * !H don't see that address (198.133.219.25) in t

Re: cisco.com

So cisco has no BGP is that what I'm hearing... Oh the irony :) --Original Message-- From: Aaron Millisor To: R. Benjamin Kessler Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: cisco.com Sent: Aug 4, 2009 10:45 AM Not sure the ETA but the network that the address for cisco.com resolve

Re: cisco.com

Am 04.08.2009 um 15:42 schrieb Alex Nderitu: Facebook seems to also be affected. facebook works fine from germany I'm unable to get to cisco.com from multiple places on the 'net (including downforeveryoneorjustme.com); any ideas on the cause and ETR? An error occurred while processin

Re: cisco.com

We have seen the route for cisco withdrawn from 208 and 2828. Facebook seems fine Dominic J. Eidson wrote: > > Both work from Austin, TX. > > > > - d. > > On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Alex Nderitu wrote: > >> Facebook seems to also be affected. >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: R. Benjami

Re: cisco.com

Seeing same issue from Chicago via Qwest and HE. > > Both work from Austin, TX. > > > > - d. > > On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Alex Nderitu wrote: > >> Facebook seems to also be affected. >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: R. Benjamin Kessler >> To: nanog@nanog.org >> Subject: cisco.com >> Dat

Re: cisco.com

See: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2009-August/001386.html I do not have a route to that IP (198.133.219.25) in BGP either.. On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:34 AM, R. Benjamin Kessler wrote: > Hey Gang - > > I'm unable to get to cisco.com from multiple places on the 'net > (including downfore

Re: cisco.com

Facebook up. Cisco down. From eastern canada --Original Message-- From: Alex Nderitu To: R. Benjamin Kessler Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: cisco.com Sent: Aug 4, 2009 10:42 AM Facebook seems to also be affected. -Original Message- From: R. Benjamin Kessler To: nanog

Re: cisco.com

> I'm unable to get to cisco.com from multiple places on the 'net > (including downforeveryoneorjustme.com); any ideas on the cause and ETR? Here too -- snip -- core-01.fra1#sh ip bgp 198.133.219.25 BGP4 : None of the BGP4 routes match the display condition -- snap --

Re: cisco.com

Not sure the ETA but the network that the address for cisco.com resolves to (198.133.219.0/24) is no longer in BGP. -- - Aaron Millisor R. Benjamin Kessler wrote: Hey Gang - I'm unable to get to cisco.com from multiple places on the 'net

Re: cisco.com

Both work from Austin, TX. - d. On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Alex Nderitu wrote: Facebook seems to also be affected. -Original Message- From: R. Benjamin Kessler To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: cisco.com Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:34:46 -0400 Hey Gang - I'm unable to get to cisco.com from

Re: cisco.com

Facebook seems to also be affected. -Original Message- From: R. Benjamin Kessler To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: cisco.com Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:34:46 -0400 Hey Gang - I'm unable to get to cisco.com from multiple places on the 'net (including downforeveryoneorjustme.com); any ideas