I am also a big fan of installing cake (sqm-scripts) in front cable devices.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 5:59 AM Todd Stiers wrote:
>
> [OP here]
>
> Just some minor follow up:
>
> - The tech was able to swap out their RG with the modem-only one that I had
> sent (after making a couple phone calls).
[OP here]
Just some minor follow up:
- The tech was able to swap out their RG with the modem-only one that I
had sent (after making a couple phone calls). It didn't seem like they
could provision a user-supplied modem remotely for some reason, but it also
sounded like maybe this wasn't something
It’s been a while, but attacks that take advantage of this are (or at least in the past have been) real.https://blog.sucuri.net/2014/09/website-security-compromised-website-used-to-hack-home-routers.htmlhttps://www.digitaltrends.com/web/_javascript_-malware-mobile/ I recall when this stuff first
I agree, but if we start listing every massive security vulnerability that
can be found on the intra-home LAN in consumer-grade routers and home
electronics equipment, or things that people operate in their homes with
the factory-default passwords, we'd be here all month in a thread with 300
emails
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 2:36 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> I would hope that this router's admin "password" interface is only accessible
> from the LAN side.
> This is bad, yes, but not utterly catastrophic.
It means that any compromised device on the LAN can access the router
with whatever permissions
I would hope that this router's admin "password" interface is only
accessible from the LAN side. It's not listening to the world for a login
with "password", right? Have you port scanned its WAN interface and tried
connecting to it to see what's listening?
This is bad, yes, but not utterly catast
The first router would still be vulnerable, and through it the second router.
On 8 February 2023 16:06:07 UTC, Josh Luthman
wrote:
>What's the problem with double NAT? I can't imagine an elderly mom trying
>to host Xbox games - which is 95% of the problem with double NAT these days
>(the other
What's the problem with double NAT? I can't imagine an elderly mom trying
to host Xbox games - which is 95% of the problem with double NAT these days
(the other 5% being Ubiquiti bros having to access their Unifi router from
anywhere).
Your screenshots didn't come through, I suspect it's stripped
8 matches
Mail list logo
