> Consider two alternatives :
>
> - Finance guns, soldier training, refugee camps, humanitarian ground
> help and political meetings and treaties to make a revolution happens
> in a (more or less controled) bloodshed
>
> OR
>
> - Take a strong position to preserve freedom of speech and wider use
>
2011/6/7 Jorge Amodio :
>> http://m.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/06/internet-a-human-right
>
> Looks like the UN does not have anything more interesting or important
> to do, or how to waste time and money.
>
> What happened with the other rights? yada yada and a signature in a
> paper does not mea
On a second thought, does this mean that you if get arrested after
reading the Miranda thing you get free WiFi ?
-J
> http://m.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/06/internet-a-human-right
Looks like the UN does not have anything more interesting or important
to do, or how to waste time and money.
What happened with the other rights? yada yada and a signature in a
paper does not mean much.
-J
Internet is a big set of tools just bundled in another big one. And just
like another tool, we can use it for "good things and bad things". I think
this UN declaration must invite us to think over how adecuate or inadecuate
is the way that we use the Internet, as so as individuals and so as society
On 06/06/11 6:42 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:40:57 PDT, JC Dill said:
I will happily go along with this argument when the "3 strikes you're
off" copyright laws are enforced thru a process which A) assumes you are
innocent until proven guilty; B) that you are allow
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:40:57 PDT, JC Dill said:
> I will happily go along with this argument when the "3 strikes you're
> off" copyright laws are enforced thru a process which A) assumes you are
> innocent until proven guilty; B) that you are allowed to present a
> defense and challenge all wit
> From: Gadi Evron [mailto:g...@linuxbox.org]
>
> The title is misleading, as this is more about "denying" access. But
> this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any*
> operational implications, but every operator to see this was
> immediately
> worried. I figure it warrants a di
> I will happily go along with this argument when the "3 strikes you're
> off" copyright laws are enforced thru a process which A) assumes you
> are
> innocent until proven guilty; B) that you are allowed to present a
> defense and challenge all witnesses; and C) that you are entitled to
> have you
On 05/06/11 5:18 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 02:39:45 +0300, Gadi Evron said:
The title is misleading, as this is more about "denying" access. But
this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any*
operational implications, but every operator to see this wa
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 02:39:45 +0300, Gadi Evron said:
> The title is misleading, as this is more about "denying" access. But
> this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any*
> operational implications, but every operator to see this was immediately
> worried. I figure it warrants a
11 matches
Mail list logo
