On 2-jun-2007, at 1:27, Fred Baker wrote:
But ULAs *do* require router magic. They require a policy to be in
place that causes them to not be advertised unless the policy is
overridden, and a policy that doesn't believe them even if they are
mistakenly advertised.
Well, there is no such
On Jun 1, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Solution: new type of local addresses that doesn't require any
router magic to keep the packets within the site, and is globally
unique so network merging isn't an issue.
But ULAs *do* require router magic. They require a policy to b
On 2-jun-2007, at 0:43, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
One of the potential values of unique private address space is the
ability to built your own internets. Now whether there is value to
unique but private address space that is significantly higher than
private but non-unique address space (1918 style)
On 2-jun-2007, at 0:34, Randy Bush wrote:
[ i do not see mail from the respondent. and this reminds me why ]
Hm, I wonder what it is that I did to deserve that and who else I
share this special status with.
we still need a operator to make a short summary preso extolling
the virtues of
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>
> On 1-jun-2007, at 20:51, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> we still need a operator to make a short summary preso extolling
>> the virtues of ula central at the bof.
>
> How exactly are the opinions of people who operate ISP networks about
> address space that's never used
[ i do not see mail from the respondent. and this reminds me why ]
>>> we still need a operator to make a short summary preso extolling
>>> the virtues of ula central at the bof.
>> How exactly are the opinions of people who operate ISP networks about
>> address space that's never used on the in
On Jun 1, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 1-jun-2007, at 20:51, Randy Bush wrote:
we still need a operator to make a short summary preso extolling
the virtues of ula central at the bof.
How exactly are the opinions of people who operate ISP networks
about address space
On 1-jun-2007, at 20:51, Randy Bush wrote:
we still need a operator to make a short summary preso extolling
the virtues of ula central at the bof.
How exactly are the opinions of people who operate ISP networks about
address space that's never used on the internet relevant?
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Owen DeLong
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 1:05 PM
To: Randy Bush
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: ULA BoF
Perhaps the difficulty in finding one says something of the operational
virtues of ULA.
Owen
On Jun 1, 2007, at 11:51 AM, Randy Bush wrote
Perhaps the difficulty in finding one says something of the operational
virtues of ULA.
Owen
On Jun 1, 2007, at 11:51 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
we still need a operator to make a short summary preso extolling
the virtues of ula central at the bof.
randy
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME crypto
we still need a operator to make a short summary preso extolling
the virtues of ula central at the bof.
randy
11 matches
Mail list logo
