On Fri, June 29, 2007 4:35 pm, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> I remember in the past an excellent system using Sesame Street characters
> names.
Doesn't scale though :(
Hence the rapid emergence of southpark-naming-draft-001.txt,
flintstones-naming-draft-001.txt. Not to mention the grover /
super-grov
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Cat Okita wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
> > perhaps a decent other question is: Do I want to let the whole world know
> > that router X with interfaces of type Y/Z/Q is located in 1-wilshire.
> >
> > I suppose on the one hand it's helpful to know that
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:15:30 PDT, you said:
> Star Trek Federation Starships... they seem to invent more daily, so no
> problems running out.
If your DNS is RFC3490-enabled, you can go for the Klingon and Romulan
ships too. Particularly handy if you're into security through obscurity. :)
pgp
> If you have more routers than muppets, you have a problem.
More muppets than routers is also a problem
brandon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:35:09 BST, "Neil J. McRae" said:
I remember in the past an excellent system using Sesame Street characters names.
This only works in small shops. If you have more routers than muppets, you
have a problem. Had a lab once where we named machines
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:35:09 BST, "Neil J. McRae" said:
> I remember in the past an excellent system using Sesame Street characters
> names.
This only works in small shops. If you have more routers than muppets, you
have a problem. Had a lab once where we named machines after colors. That
hit s
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
>
> Mythic Beasts Ltd, IIRC, names their machines after, uh, mythic
> beasts. Which is consistent, but not especially useful..
perhaps a decent other question is: Do I want to let the whole world know
that router X with interfaces of type Y/Z/Q i
I remember in the past an excellent system using Sesame Street characters names.
Mythic Beasts Ltd, IIRC, names their machines after, uh, mythic
beasts. Which is consistent, but not especially useful..
On 6/29/07, Leigh Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Then you get some networks who name all the routers after cheeses or
characters from bill and ben the flowerpot men.
--
Then you get some networks who name all the routers after cheeses or
characters from bill and ben the flowerpot men.
--
Leigh
Mark Tinka wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007 00:27, Olsen, Jason wrote:
So, what practices do you folks follow? What are the up
and downsides you encounter?
On Friday 15 June 2007 00:27, Olsen, Jason wrote:
> So, what practices do you folks follow? What are the up
> and downsides you encounter?
At my previous employer, we came up with a formula that we
were happy with. For reverse DNS, it involves:
* defining the interface
* defining the device f
On 14-Jun-2007, at 16:25, K K wrote:
On 6/14/07, randal k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This particular issue has been confounding to work around as well.
The issue
of constantly updating DNS to match the current topology is a
pain, but in
my opinion, very necessary.
I'm not entirely convi
On 6/14/07, randal k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This particular issue has been confounding to work around as well. The issue
of constantly updating DNS to match the current topology is a pain, but in
my opinion, very necessary.
I'm not entirely convinced DNS records for every possible interfac
13 matches
Mail list logo
