On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Any thoughts on products that screw up networks in deterministic (and
> realistic found-in-the-wild) ways? I'm thinking of stuff like
> PacketStorm, Dummynet, etc. Dial up jitter, latency, tail drop, RED,
> whatever...
>
>
have used this in the lab, works OK. You can use it with the bridge util to
stay layer 2.
-Original Message-
From: Juuso Lehtinen [mailto:juuso.lehti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 9:02 PM
To: Robert E. Seastrom
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: This network is too go
You have pretty much two approaches:
-Special built hardware network emulators
-Network emulator software running on generic PC
Special built HW:
If you need extreme accuracy, i.e., delay generation to micro/nanosecond
accuracy, you need to go with special purpose boxes. Special built HW also
usua
I know people who have been very happy with Apposite. They have a couple
different lines that can simulate a lot of different conditions.
http://www.apposite-tech.com
I know they call them WAN simulators but I know a company that strictly
uses them for layer2 to simulate congestion between switch
IWL's "Maxwell" is probably what you want:
http://www.iwl.com/press-releases/new-capabilities-for-maxwell-the-network-impairment-system.html
Good luck breaking stuff!
On Wednesday, February 1, 2012, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:51:13PM -0500, Robert
In a message written on Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:51:13PM -0500, Robert E.
Seastrom wrote:
> Any thoughts on products that screw up networks in deterministic (and
> realistic found-in-the-wild) ways? I'm thinking of stuff like
> PacketStorm, Dummynet, etc. Dial up jitter, latency, tail drop, RED,
6 matches
Mail list logo
