Re: Spam from ARIN to POC addresses

On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, at 14:40, John Curran wrote: > Thanks for raising this… here’s how ARIN Meeting Invites are handled – > > A series of announcements about registration and related reminders are > sent to arin-announce and published on www.arin.net, including: >> Registration Open – 12-16 we

Re: Spam from ARIN to POC addresses

On Sep 12, 2023, at 5:56 PM, packetcat wrote: At 14:01 and 14.46 EST I received two identical emails from meeti...@arin-events.net with the subject “Join us for ARIN 52 in October”. One was sent to the NOC POC address and one to the abuse POC address for my ASN. As far as I am aware, I never

Re: Spam from ARIN to POC addresses

I can help you get rid of pesky ARIN, let's start a 8.2 transfer! On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 3:00 PM packetcat wrote: > At 14:01 and 14.46 EST I received two identical emails from > meeti...@arin-events.net with the subject “Join us for ARIN 52 in > October”. One was sent to the NOC POC address and

Re: Spam from ARIN to POC addresses

> > I hope this is not the start of a new pattern of behaviour because that > would not be…good to put it mildly. > What exactly is "not good" about ARIN emailing about the ARIN Public Policy and Members meeting, to email addresses on file related to ARIN assigned resources? On Tue, Sep 12, 2023

Re: [Spam]Re: A letter from the CEO

Hundred Meg, Ten Gig, One erm...? Maybe harder to create vernacular for. > On 2020-11-23, at 14:35, Mark Tinka wrote: > […] > > Given that Tbps is still relatively uncommon in many operator networks, it's > not uncommon to hear people say Megabit and Gigabit with no problem, but say > Terabyte

RE: [SPAM] Re: plea for comcast/sprint handoff debug help

please remove me from list Original Message Subject: [SPAM] Re: plea for comcast/sprint handoff debug help From: Alex Band Date: Thu, October 29, 2020 2:14 pm To: Randy Bush Cc: North American Network Operators' Group > On

RE: [SPAM] Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter

PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THE LISTTHANK YOU Original Message Subject: [SPAM] Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter From: colin johnston Date: Thu, October 29, 2020 11:12 am To: Mark Tinka Cc: NANOG H

Re: SPAM for nanog@ senders

Hi Randy, > On 22 Sep 2020, at 00:14, Randy Bush wrote: > >> I already taught my SpamAssasin and then deleted them > > :0 > * ^From:.*@csvwebsupport.com > | /usr/bin/mail -s 'Screw You' dating.supp...@csvwebsupport.com < > ~/screw-you.txt I’m using different technique. I like tarpitting such

Re: SPAM for nanog@ senders

> I already taught my SpamAssasin and then deleted them :0 * ^From:.*@csvwebsupport.com | /usr/bin/mail -s 'Screw You' dating.supp...@csvwebsupport.com < ~/screw-you.txt

Re: SPAM for nanog@ senders

Job, I already taught my SpamAssasin and then deleted them, and my Postfix is no longer taking submission from the IP from which they were sent - 216.176.196.72. They seem to be using correct sending host according to SPF record (host spamtitan.csvwebsupport.com validates using 'dating.supp...@cs

Re: SPAM for nanog@ senders

On 21/Sep/20 12:47, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: NANOGers, Have you got email from 'dating.supp...@csvwebsupport.com’ immediately after you post to nanog@? First time I thought it’s coincidence, but today when I got it, it’s hardly one ;) Topic is '[#WHB-257-41491]: Re: XX’ where is sub

Re: SPAM for nanog@ senders

Dear Łukasz, others, Can you please send any suspecious emails (including headers) to the mailing list admin team at ge...@nanog.org? We'll try to figure out if it happens through an existing subscription. Kind regards, Job (hat: NANOG geeks) On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:51:44PM +0200, Octolus D

Re: SPAM for nanog@ senders

I did yeah, annoying. Best Regards, Octolus On 9/21/2020 12:50:54 PM, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: NANOGers, Have you got email from 'dating.supp...@csvwebsupport.com’ immediately after you post to nanog@? First time I thought it’s coincidence, but today when I got it, it’s hardly one ;) Topic is '

Re: SPAM: Re: Cogent emails

On 14/09/2020 18:13, Simon Lockhart wrote: > We gave in and just bought a small amount of transit from them. Aha! You're the reason they don't stop! :p -- Tom

Re: SPAM: Re: Cogent emails

I manage three networks. All three have transit from Cogent. I get assaulted non-stop by Cogent sales reps. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Simon Lockhart" To: "David G

Re: SPAM: Re: Cogent emails

I tell them to hit me up once they have direct peering with HE.net. Haven’t heard from them since. -Mike > On Sep 14, 2020, at 10:15, Simon Lockhart wrote: > > We gave in and just bought a small amount of transit from them. The sales > emails stopped. Seems to be about the only effective met

Re: Spam due to new ARIN allocation

Oddly enough, I created a Z Org for legacy resources and got hit up on linked-in by IPv4 brokers as well as some spam from Cogent. Annoying. > On Aug 4, 2019, at 09:29, Tim Burke wrote: > > Done, Sir. Thanks. > > Tim Burke > t...@burke.us > >> On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, at 10:42 PM, John Curran

Re: Spam due to new ARIN allocation

Done, Sir. Thanks. Tim Burke t...@burke.us On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, at 10:42 PM, John Curran wrote: > Tim - > > When you have moment, could you forward both of those Whois spam messages to > complia...@arin.net ? > > Thanks! > /John > > John Curran > President and CEO > American Registry for Int

Re: Spam due to new ARIN allocation

Tim - When you have moment, could you forward both of those Whois spam messages to complia...@arin.net ? Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers] On 2 Aug 2019, at 7:32 PM, Tim Burke mailto:t...@tburke.us>> wrote: We rece

Re: Spam due to new ARIN allocation

> > Do it. I'd name and shame all of them. Ryan On Fri, Aug 2, 2019, 4:33 PM Tim Burke wrote: > >> We recently received a new ASN from ARIN - you know what that means... >> the sales vultures come out to play! >> >> So far, it has resulted in spam from Cogent (which is, of course, to be >> expec

Re: Spam due to new ARIN allocation

On 8/2/19 7:32 PM, Tim Burke wrote: So far, it has resulted in spam from Cogent (which is, of course, to be expected), and now another company called "CapCon Networks" -http://www.capconnetworks.com. As far as I am aware, this practice is against ARIN's Terms of Use. Is it worth reporting to A

Re: Spam

- Original Message - > From: "jra" > Someone tell Trevor Walford at ECG in Valdosta that scraping the list for > addresses to spam is a suboptimal approach? I have to apologize to Mr Walford. A search through my old mail archive shows mail from his organization from a year and two yea

Re: [SPAM] Re: Bell outage

We have multiple redundant backup paths in case of a cut. The backup paths run about 1 mm away from the primary path in the same cable in the same conduit. ;) On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Nate Metheny wrote: > :s/fiber/conduit > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Rod Beck > wrote: > >> Ever

Re: [SPAM] Re: Bell outage

:s/fiber/conduit On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Rod Beck wrote: > Everyone has a resilient network until they don't. 😊 > > > > From: NANOG on > behalf of jim deleskie > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 8:07 PM > To: J > Cc: NANOG list > Subject: Re: Bell outage >

Re: -Spam- BGP IP prefix hijacking

The more tools the better the net can become. I find that BGPmon.net is pretty good. I have not yet found anything else as good. You put in your prefixes and they email notify you of bgp changes they see with the AS hop string announcing. Helpful not just for hijacks - but to know that peers of pe

Re: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

On 11/Nov/16 21:34, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Has the name been a problem for you? Asking vendors about support > must be a bit awkward these days. Why do you reckon? Mark.

Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

On 11/Nov/16 08:22, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > > We have a similar use case, and we run BGP on Quagga. Works great. > Haven't seen a need for either IS-IS or OSPF on Quagga yet. Two reasons for us: * IGP metrics in the IGP will determine latency-based decisions. I know BGP can infer the

Re: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

> > I think people were looking for specifics about the implementation > > deficits in the junos version which caused enough problems to justify > > the term "not getting it"? > > The only IS-IS implementation we struggle with is Quagga. > > For that, we run OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 on Quagga and redist

Re: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

On 11/Nov/16 02:00, Josh Reynolds wrote: > That said, glance across the landscape as a whole of all of the routing > platforms out there. Hardware AND softwsre. Which ones support bare bones > IS-IS? Which ones have a decent subset of extensions? Are they comparable > or compatible with others?

Re: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

On 10/Nov/16 23:53, Charles van Niman wrote: > I don't think Nick asked for a list, just one single thing, any one > thing. To me at least, it doesn't really make sense to make the > statement you did, without pointing out what can be done to improve > the situation. I would be very interested t

Re: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

On 10/Nov/16 21:23, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > I think people were looking for specifics about the implementation > deficits in the junos version which caused enough problems to justify > the term "not getting it"? The only IS-IS implementation we struggle with is Quagga. For that, we run OSPFv2

Re: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

On 10/Nov/16 11:03, Randy Bush wrote: > > as painful as ospf If I did run OSPF, I'd probably do it with a single area, likely OSPFv3 with IPv4 address family support. Kinky, but it is 2016... > > in a research rack with more than one router, i run is-is. Good man :-)... Mark.

Re: spam smackdown?

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > 3) Anyone who feels this is so frickin’ bad it is unbearable, and > knows they could do SO MUCH BETTER themselves, should > volunteer for the Communications Committee. Otherwise, > everyone should thank the unpaid volunteers for their gr

Re: spam smackdown?

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: Otherwise, everyone should thank the unpaid volunteers for their gracious and excellent work day after day, year after year. Or just STFU. Thank you Communications Committee. What he said. John Springer

thank you Re: spam smackdown?

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:03:26PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > 3) Anyone who feels this is so frickin??? bad it is unbearable, and knows > they could do SO MUCH BETTER themselves, should volunteer for the > Communications Committee. Otherwise, everyone should thank the unpaid > volunteers

Re: spam smackdown?

On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: >> It looks like someone's trying to make a point. > > The takeaway is: > > 1) NANOG doesn't seem to do simple inbound spam filtering :-) In fairness to the Communications Committee (of

RE: spam smackdown?

I love all the email about spam -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ishmael Rufus Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 12:59 PM To: sur...@mauigateway.com Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: spam smackdown? "It looks like someone's trying to make a point

Re: spam smackdown?

luckily, many of us saw almost none of this spam due to effective inbound spam filtering on our accounts. which is awesome. i did, however, manage to see lots of messages from people complaining about the spam that they did receive. :-) t On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:

Re: spam smackdown?

"It looks like someone's trying to make a point" Must be an Outlook exploit affected several clients. On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: > > > It looks like someone's trying to make a point. > > - > New message, please read > -

Re: spam smackdown?

On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: > > > It looks like someone's trying to make a point. The takeaway is: 1) NANOG doesn't seem to do simple inbound spam filtering :-) -Jim P.

Re: spam smackdown?

It has been more than a point. :) Thanks, Murat Yuksel > On Oct 24, 2015, at 7:39 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: > > > > It looks like someone's trying to make a point. > > - > New message, please read > --- > >

Re: SPAM: AW: important

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:55:51PM +0200, Gunther Stammwitz wrote: > This is unbelievable: Yes, it is. Quoting back a spammer's entire message to the entire list, including the payload, is unbelievably stupid. It would have been better to call this to the attention of those charged with the car

Re: SPAM: AW: important

On 9/24/2015 9:20 AM, TR Shaw wrote: Strange as it has been listed in SURBL for ever since the site was cracked. fwiw, likewise, that same spammy domain has been on invaluement's URI blacklist since 9/17/2015 2:27 a.m. (+- a couple of minutes) -- Rob McEwen

Re: SPAM: AW: important

Strange as it has been listed in SURBL for ever since the site was cracked. scm-70.com.wild.surbl.org has address 127.0.0.68 > On Sep 24, 2015, at 8:55 AM, Gunther Stammwitz wrote: > > This is unbelievable: > We have seen these kinds of spam-messages over the last weeks on different > mail acc

RE: [SPAM]Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak?

Absolutely on point. Let's solve the problem, not the blame. ERM Evan R Moore Network Engineer and Bitwrangler Sovernet Communications -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Randy Bush Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 9:02 PM To: North American Network O

Re: ****SPAM:5.2**** Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

On 12/08/14 23:10, William Herrin wrote: > I note that the recommended command in that article, "mls cef > maximum-routes ip 1000", will throw most of your IPv6 routes out of > the TCAM instead. Which if you have any IPv6 traffic of substance just > kills you in the other direction. Might want to t

Re: [SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?

"Dennis Burgess" writes: > Mikrotik really relies on its list of consultants and trainers, > these are all outside companies, yes such as mine, that provide the > higher class of "support" than MikroTik own e-mail. . While their > e-mail does have a lack of responsiveness, I was told the volume

RE: [SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?

eate Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com - 900Mhz - LTE - 3G - 3.65 - TV Whitespace  -Original Message- From: Rob Seastrom [mailto:r...@seastrom.com] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 6:16 AM To: Justin Wilson Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: [SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Rou

Re: [SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?

Justin Wilson writes: > The biggest problem with Mikrotik is you just can¹t call them up for > support on buggy code. In a critical network this can be a major problem. I've contacted them (via email) and the experience seems to be exactly the same as dealing with first level TAC at the b

Re: [SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?

; http://www.thebrotherswisp.com -Original Message- From: Dale Rumph Date: Friday, December 27, 2013 at 10:04 AM To: Dennis Burgess Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: [SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences? >Out of all the network hardware I have wor

Re: [SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?

Out of all the network hardware I have worked on in operations these were by far some of the worst. I read lots of good things but like most things in life these just dont stack up against a Cisco or Juniper for stability and reliability. Most of the ISP's I have worked with were HSD but i also fol

[SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?

We have many with full routing tables. Load balancing, works fine, I have one site with 8 DSL lines doing balancing across them. We typically don't use a GRE tunnel, but OpenVPN or IPSEC work great. Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition" 

[SPAM]RE: [SPAM]Re: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?

Guess I should chime in here. As far as the CCR, I know several customers running in excess of 1 gig of traffic though them, one has 16 BGP sessions, several of those are full tables, and the rest are on an peering exchange. There are other units, like the ones we supply, that does more than

Re: spam scraper?

We've had multiple e-mails from them to myself and another member of staff directly. They don't seem to give up if you ignore them either, they keep sending follow up e-mails saying that they haven't had any response! Given the addresses that they contacted, I suspect that they are mining de

Re: spam scraper?

We've had multiple e-mails from them to myself and another member of staff directly. They don't seem to give up if you ignore them either, they keep sending follow up e-mails saying that they haven't had any response! Given the addresses that they contacted, I suspect that they are mining detail

Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:16 PM, John Peach wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:05:36 -0400 > shawn wilson wrote: > >> can some op filter this asshole? >> > > Please stop forwarding the whole message; I'd already dropped him in my > procmail rules. > *shrug*, it needed a new thread since it ot of t

Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity

On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:05:36 -0400 shawn wilson wrote: > can some op filter this asshole? > Please stop forwarding the whole message; I'd already dropped him in my procmail rules. -- john

Re: Spam from inteliquent.com subject "nanog"

Same. Nothing here. Maybe someone at Tiscali/Tinet where fixing their mailing with their new name and made an error. On that subject... What kind of trouble Tiscali/Tinet got into to pull an "Arthur Anderson" and change their name to "Inteliquent"? Context: "Arthur Anderso

RE: Spam from inteliquent.com subject "nanog"

Nothing here for what it's worth Paul -Original Message- From: Jay Hennigan [mailto:j...@west.net] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 11:01 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Spam from inteliquent.com subject "nanog" Anyone else just get this? Curious if they're scraping this list for addres

Re: Spam from Telx

In article <4f3e5d8d.60...@foobar.org> you write: >So, anyone else get spammed by Telx after posting to nanog? Yes. -- Regards, John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly

RE: Spam from Telx

> So, anyone else get spammed by Telx after posting to nanog? > > This is massively unprofessional. > > Nick Yep. I shot a complaint to customerserv...@telx.com. Assuming Mr. Fitzpatrick does not control that portion of the company, it may be of value for other recipients of his spam to do

Re: Spam from Telx

Once upon a time, Justin M. Streiner said: > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote: > >\o/ i got one too, i'll put a bunch of sales droids on this "George" from > >telx right away to make him an offer in return *grin* > > I did respond directly to him, and got a somewhat indignant respon

Re: Spam from Telx

I've been getting voicemails from someone, leaving a first name only saying they have question that only I can answer. Dangling bait like that is a big red flag so they don't get a callback. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Justin M. Streiner < strei...@cluebyfour.org> wrote: > On Sat, 18 Feb 2

Re: Spam from Telx

On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Mark Andrews wrote: I did respond directly to him, and got a somewhat indignant response back, stating that he had no idea what I was talking about and that my contact information had come from an "opt in email broker". It's going to be one of those days It's a little

Re: Spam from Telx

In message , "Justin M . Streiner" writes: > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote: > > > \o/ i got one too, i'll put a bunch of sales droids on this "George" from > > telx right away to make him an offer in return *grin* > > I did respond directly to him, and got a somewhat indignant r

Re: Spam from Telx

No he didnt. The one he sent to me actually included part of the thread he picked me up from. I told him the most exciting thing he could do is to not spam me again. Poor guy, did nobody tell him? -- Leigh Porter On 17 Feb 2012, at 15:11, "Justin M. Streiner" wrote: > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012,

Re: Spam from Telx

we have something exitig happening at telx! we are now connected to the "backbone" through a 128kbit/s adsl line! -- Greetings, Sven Olaf Kamphuis, CB3ROB Ltd. & Co. KG = Address: Koloniestrasse 34 VAT Tax ID:

Re: Spam from Telx

needless to say their own website is slow as poo through a coffee filter :P reminds me of the isdn days :P -- Greetings, Sven Olaf Kamphuis, CB3ROB Ltd. & Co. KG = Address: Koloniestrasse 34 VAT Tax ID: DE2672

Re: Spam from Telx

On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: In other words he bought a list of leads. Possibly, albeit a poorly screened list of leads. jms On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote: I did respond directly to him, and got a somewhat indignant response back, stating

Re: Spam from Telx

In other words he bought a list of leads. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote: > I did respond directly to him, and got a somewhat indignant response back, > stating that he had no idea what I was talking about and that my contact > information had come from an "opt in email

Re: Spam from Telx

On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Charles Mills wrote: I didn't even respond. I think many of these high-pressure-aggressive-types always have an answer like that conveniently vague enough as to give them an "out". I did mention to him that such tactics were likely to create a large group of people who w

Re: Spam from Telx

I didn't even respond. I think many of these high-pressure-aggressive-types always have an answer like that conveniently vague enough as to give them an "out". On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote: > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote: > > \o/ i got one too, i'l

Re: Spam from Telx

On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote: \o/ i got one too, i'll put a bunch of sales droids on this "George" from telx right away to make him an offer in return *grin* I did respond directly to him, and got a somewhat indignant response back, stating that he had no idea what I was talk

Re: Spam from Telx

Ya, i got a message 2 days ago from them. It was very vague. Only 2 sentences. -Grant On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote: > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > So, anyone else get spammed by Telx after posting to nanog? >> >> This is massively unprofessional.

Re: Spam from Telx

\o/ i got one too, i'll put a bunch of sales droids on this "George" from telx right away to make him an offer in return *grin* (this is how you treat ppl trying to sell you something in an aggressive manner, you just have your people try to sell -them- something in return ;) On Fri, 17 Feb

Re: Spam from Telx

On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Nick Hilliard wrote: So, anyone else get spammed by Telx after posting to nanog? This is massively unprofessional. Yep - just got one a few minutes ago. I was just getting ready to spin up my trolling-for-business-by-scraping-addresses-from-nanog-is-bad-mojo response.

RE: Spam from Telx

He has spammed by responding to posts that people have made in the past, he is still trolling I guess. James -Original Message- From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 9:01 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Spam from Telx So, anyone else get spammed by

Re: {Spam?} Re: Traceroute explanation

Hi! Using LFT: root@debian:~# lft 8.8.8.8 traceroute to 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 172.28.1.1 (172.28.1.1) 0.798 ms 0.711 ms 2 10.16.0.2 (10.16.0.2) 0.414 ms 0.331 ms 3 41.200.16.1 (41.200.16.1) 11.400 ms 11.474 ms 4 172.17.2.25 (172.17.2.25) 10.184 ms 11.322 m

Re: *** SPAM DETECTED (mx01) *** Re: Looking for an opinion on Colo Solutions/Orlando colocation

Thanks Tom, I will you keep in you mind if/when Melbourne gets into the picture. Right now it's Orlando proper. -graham On 8/21/11 1:34 PM, "TR Shaw" wrote: > > On Aug 21, 2011, at 2:16 PM, Graham Wooden wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> Our next POP deployment is going to be in Orlando (mainly s

Re: Spam?

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 06:48:54PM +1200, Don Gould wrote: > OMG can't you people run proper spam filtering on your own mail > servers that filter out the nanog messages that are spam?! One of the fundamental principles of spam mitigation is that blocking is usually best (in terms of: efficacy, ac

Re: Spam?

OMG can't you people run proper spam filtering on your own mail servers that filter out the nanog messages that are spam?! I think I've had two messages in the last month, while others of you are talking about dozens? Do you need to buy some hosting for your email accounts? My filtering wor

Re: Spam?

OMG can't you people run proper spam filtering on your own mail servers that filter out the nanog messages that are spam?! I think I've had two messages in the last month, while others of you are talking about dozens? Do you need to buy some hosting for your email accounts? D On 12/07/2011

Re: Spam?

> From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Tue Jul 12 11:29:29 > 2011 > Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:22:09 -0400 (EDT) > From: Jay Ashworth > To: NANOG > Subject: Re: Spam? > > - Original Message - > > From: "Randy Bush" &g

Re: Spam?

- Original Message - > From: "Randy Bush" > > Also, where is the reply to header? > > still in the garbage, where it belongs NANOG, being a traditional, (semi-)public, technical mailing list, has never had a Reply-to header, and never should. I concur with the people who assert that ad

Re: Spam?

- Original Message - > From: "Randy Bush" > >> thanks for the hard work, folk. > > Let's work harder > > thanks for volunteering. when will you be flying out to the bay? I suspect, Randy, that Ferg *knows* how to use ssh. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink

Re: Spam?

> Also, where is the reply to header? still in the garbage, where it belongs

Re: Spam?

On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Thomas Donnelly wrote: > I received no spam, and had I received 2 pieces, it may have been slightly > irritating. > > What is irritating is the sheer number of people complaining about it. Can we > stop please? I think they get it. > > -=Tom > Tom, you are one

Re: Spam?

On 7/12/2011 10:00 AM, Randy Bush wrote: thanks for the hard work, folk. Let's work harder thanks for volunteering. when will you be flying out to the bay? randy I'm with you Randy, I'm disappointed with the complaints I see here. People don't seem to show much appreciation. Jason

Re: Spam?

I received no spam, and had I received 2 pieces, it may have been slightly irritating. What is irritating is the sheer number of people complaining about it. Can we stop please? I think they get it. -=Tom On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:58:42 -0500, Paul Ferguson wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011

Re: Spam?

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Randy Bush wrote: >>> thanks for the hard work, folk. >> Let's work harder > > thanks for volunteering.  when will you be flying out to the bay? > I already live in The Bay Area. Is there an 'revert' button? - ferg -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson  Engineerin

Re: Spam?

>> thanks for the hard work, folk. > Let's work harder thanks for volunteering. when will you be flying out to the bay? randy

Re: Spam?

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Randy Bush wrote: >> New location means we now get spam on Nanog? > > no extra charge :) > > i have lived through maintaing decades of mailing lists and do not envy > the nanog mailing list crew and glen over at amsl. > > thanks for the hard work, folk. > Let's w

Re: Spam?

> New location means we now get spam on Nanog? no extra charge :) i have lived through maintaing decades of mailing lists and do not envy the nanog mailing list crew and glen over at amsl. thanks for the hard work, folk. randy

Re: [SPAM-Low] Re: (OT) Firearms Was: UN declares Internet access a"human right"

propriate forum. > > thanks > Mike > > -Original Message- > From: Nick Olsen [mailto:n...@flhsi.com] > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 10:15 AM > To: Andrew Kirch; nanog@nanog.org > Subject: re: [SPAM-Low] Re: (OT) Firearms Was: UN declares Internet > access a"

Re: [SPAM-Low] Re: (OT) Firearms Was: UN declares Internet access a"human right"

opriate forum. > > thanks > Mike > > -Original Message- > From: Nick Olsen [mailto:n...@flhsi.com] > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 10:15 AM > To: Andrew Kirch; nanog@nanog.org > Subject: re: [SPAM-Low] Re: (OT) Firearms Was: UN declares Internet > access a"human

RE: [SPAM-Low] Re: (OT) Firearms Was: UN declares Internet access a"human right"

Hi : Fair enough, missed that, Thanks Mike From: Nick Olsen [mailto:n...@flhsi.com] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 10:22 AM To: Mike Rae; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: [SPAM-Low] Re: (OT) Firearms Was: UN declares Internet access a"human right" Hence the (OT) tag. -

RE: [SPAM-Low] Re: (OT) Firearms Was: UN declares Internet access a"human right"

Hence the (OT) tag. -Nick Olsen From: "Mike Rae" Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 12:20 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: [SPAM-Low] Re: (OT) Firearms Was: UN declares Internet access a"human right" Hi All : How is this an operationa

RE: [SPAM-Low] Re: (OT) Firearms Was: UN declares Internet access a"human right"

Hi All : How is this an operational related discussion ? Perhaps it can be taken to more appropriate forum. thanks Mike -Original Message- From: Nick Olsen [mailto:n...@flhsi.com] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 10:15 AM To: Andrew Kirch; nanog@nanog.org Subject: re: [SPAM-Low] Re: (OT

re: [SPAM-Low] Re: (OT) Firearms Was: UN declares Internet access a "human right"

I've got a 4 inch Springfield XD service model in .45ACP, I actually prefer the .40 round. Its a bit better at inducing Hydrostatic shock just because of its velocity:energy ratio. The handgun just to get me to the bigger guns :D -Nick Olsen From: "An

Re: Spam from "baosteel"

On 3/4/2011 10:35 AM, John Peach wrote: > Common phishing scam; we see them all the time, nearly always from > accounts which have been compromised by others who respond to the same > scam. I thought this might be the case. Any particular hints on spam filters that can catch this type of thing? I

  1   2   >