Re: Slaving the root and other top-level DNS zones

2011-02-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/16/2011 22:16, Phil Regnauld wrote: Doug Barton (dougb) writes: Actually it seems like you want to jump up and down on it. Given that both the benefits and the potential problems have been extensively debated elsewhere, I'll simply say that you raise interesting questions that I think peop

Re: Slaving the root and other top-level DNS zones

2011-02-16 Thread Phil Regnauld
Doug Barton (dougb) writes: > Actually it seems like you want to jump up and down on it. Given > that both the benefits and the potential problems have been > extensively debated elsewhere, I'll simply say that you raise > interesting questions that I think people interested in this method > should

Re: Slaving the root and other top-level DNS zones

2011-02-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/16/2011 18:14, Phil Regnauld wrote: Not to tread on a landmine, Actually it seems like you want to jump up and down on it. Given that both the benefits and the potential problems have been extensively debated elsewhere, I'll simply say that you raise interesting questions that I

Re: Slaving the root and other top-level DNS zones

2011-02-16 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:14:48 +0800, Phil Regnauld said: > Point 2: > > I've heard that 98% of traffic to the root is junk, but since > NXDOMAINs get quickly neg cached, how much bandwidth conservation > and resource preservation are we talking about ? If one takes >