Thank you both. Strict mode uRPF was indeed the problem. Took awhile for
them to fix it for me, but at least it's fixed.
-- am
Anders Lindbäck wrote:
On 7 jan 2009, at 21.05, Niels Bakker wrote:
* aaron.milli...@bright.net (Aaron Millisor) [Wed 07 Jan 2009, 20:53
CET]:
[..]
If I were to pre
On 7 jan 2009, at 21.05, Niels Bakker wrote:
* aaron.milli...@bright.net (Aaron Millisor) [Wed 07 Jan 2009,
20:53 CET]:
[..]
If I were to prepend the network 1.1.1.0 to come in on 'sprint 1',
but have a route to 2.2.2.0 via 'sprint 2' so that traffic comes
in on one circuit but returns on
* aaron.milli...@bright.net (Aaron Millisor) [Wed 07 Jan 2009, 20:53 CET]:
[..]
If I were to prepend the network 1.1.1.0 to come in on 'sprint 1', but
have a route to 2.2.2.0 via 'sprint 2' so that traffic comes in on one
circuit but returns on the other, routing is broken. If I change my
route
3 matches
Mail list logo