Re: SLAAC in renumbering events

Hi, Bill, Thanks for the feedback! In-line On 10/3/19 13:54, William Herrin wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:32 AM Fernando Gont > wrote: > > If you follow the 6man working group of the IETF you may have seen a > bunch of emails on this topic, on

Re: SLAAC in renumbering events

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:32 AM Fernando Gont wrote: > If you follow the 6man working group of the IETF you may have seen a > bunch of emails on this topic, on a thread resulting from an IETF > Internet-Draft we published with Jan Žorž about "Reaction of Stateless > Address Autoconfiguration (SLAA

Re: SLAAC in renumbering events

Fernando Gont wrote: There are a number of scenarios where SLAAC hosts may end up using stale configuration information. That's because SLAAC maintain address configuration state in fully distributed manner without any authority, which is the worst possible way to do so. The only reasonable s

Re: SLAAC in renumbering events

On 3/8/19 6:32 AM, Fernando Gont wrote: Folks, If you follow the 6man working group of the IETF you may have seen a bunch of emails on this topic, on a thread resulting from an IETF Internet-Draft we published with Jan Žorž about "Reaction of Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) to Renumb