Re: Repotting report

2008-02-05 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Feb 5, 2008 2:10 AM, Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Leo Bicknell wrote: > > may try "dig any . @[a-m].root-servers.net." > > > > When I do that, I get the following response: > > > > a, c, d e, f, g, i and j return 1 SOA, 8 A, and 3 's (the first 3). > > b,

Re: Repotting report

2008-02-04 Thread Kevin Loch
Leo Bicknell wrote: I have been using queries like these to test: dig any . @f.root-servers.net | egrep "(DiG 9|)" dig +bufsize=1400 any . @f.root-servers.net | egrep "(DiG 9|)" The first offers up a standard DNS query, the second an EDNS0 query of 1400 bytes. In a standard query you'

Re: Repotting report

2008-02-04 Thread Christopher Morrow
; <<>> DiG 9.3.2 <<>> . NS @2001:503:c27::2:30 ; (1 server found) ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 37303 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 13, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 13 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;. IN

Re: Repotting report

2008-02-04 Thread Leo Bicknell
I have been using queries like these to test: dig any . @f.root-servers.net | egrep "(DiG 9|)" dig +bufsize=1400 any . @f.root-servers.net | egrep "(DiG 9|)" The first offers up a standard DNS query, the second an EDNS0 query of 1400 bytes. In a standard query you're only going to get 3