Re: RADB entry

2012-12-11 Thread Courtney Smith
.236) > Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, best > Community: 7018:2000 7018:34011 > > > Thanks, > > Chuck > > > -Original Message- > From: Courtney Smith [mailto:courtneysm...@comcast.net] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 5:38 PM

Re: RADB entry

2012-12-11 Thread Matt Addison
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Eric Krichbaum wrote: >> Absolutely. I'd rather see it done responsibly. It's hard to get rid of >> bad data/incorrect data/stale data and it shouldn't be. If done properly, >> it would be much frie

Re: RADB entry

2012-12-11 Thread Courtney Smith
> > Anyone, > > > >Hopefully this is a simple question about RADB. I'm > supporting a small wireless ISP, they just recently added a second upstream > connection - Charter (AS 20115). The IP space was originally issued by the > other upstream Windstream (AS 7029). Looking at

Re: RADB entry

2012-12-11 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Chuck Church wrote: > -Original Message- >>From: Eric Krichbaum [mailto:e...@telic.us] >>Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:31 AM >>To: 'Chuck Church'; nanog@nanog.org >>Subject: RE: RADB entry > >>While not

Re: RADB entry

2012-12-11 Thread Christopher Morrow
opher.mor...@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Christopher Morrow > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:51 AM > To: Eric Krichbaum > Cc: Chuck Church; nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: RADB entry > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Eric Krichbaum wrote: >> The origin being entered by a

RE: RADB entry

2012-12-11 Thread Chuck Church
-Original Message- >From: Eric Krichbaum [mailto:e...@telic.us] >Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:31 AM >To: 'Chuck Church'; nanog@nanog.org >Subject: RE: RADB entry >While not 100% accurate, it is very common. The origin being entered by a provider as their o

RE: RADB entry

2012-12-11 Thread Eric Krichbaum
ssage- From: christopher.mor...@gmail.com [mailto:christopher.mor...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:51 AM To: Eric Krichbaum Cc: Chuck Church; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: RADB entry On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Eric Krichbaum wrote: > The origi

Re: RADB entry

2012-12-11 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Eric Krichbaum wrote: > The origin being entered by a > provider as their own allows them to add the prefix (and have it accepted by > anyone who filters them by prefix generated) without being forced to add a > downstream (and downstream's downstreams) AS to thei

RE: RADB entry

2012-12-11 Thread Eric Krichbaum
While not 100% accurate, it is very common. The origin being entered by a provider as their own allows them to add the prefix (and have it accepted by anyone who filters them by prefix generated) without being forced to add a downstream (and downstream's downstreams) AS to their AS-SET. In genera