On Nov 18, 2013, at 3:01 AM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> Heu Michael
>
>
> But this time AS4755 wasn't their customer. It's their own network in
> India!
>
>
> I think probably it will be hard for us and in general for technical
> community to comment on business side of it but I am just curious
Heu Michael
But this time AS4755 wasn't their customer. It's their own network in
India!
I think probably it will be hard for us and in general for technical
community to comment on business side of it but I am just curious on
technical side on what it is like that? Is it missing iBGP sessions
On Nov 16, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
>
> I was looking around and noticed a pretty bad route from DTAG to Tata
> AS6453 (basically destination was Tata Comm's Indian network on AS4755). I
> am not able to understand cause for inefficient routing but I am sure I
We have a ticket open with Tata currently on a similar issue.
Traffic from our AS (51088) via Tata to DTAG goes from Amsterdam, NL, to Tata
Frankfurth, Germany, to Tata Paris, France, to DTAG In Paris, back to Germany
?? With packetloss...
Our Tinet (GT-T) routes go from Amsterdam to DTAG ( A
4 matches
Mail list logo
