For safety!
Reminds me of bonding channels in an ISDN line. We had to keep them all
apart.
For their own protection.
-Ben
> On Jun 18, 2020, at 6:18 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 18/Jun/20 14:49, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>>
>> What time was that?
>
> Back when a 12000 GSR chassis had
On 18/Jun/20 14:56, Saku Ytti wrote:
> Somewhere between 2000..2005 I personally still delivered customer
> connections that needed that. But we were providing 64kbps still to
> some odd locations, like paper mill in the middle of nowhere. I also
> needed to do MLPPP over 2*64kbps so that seria
On 18/Jun/20 14:49, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> What time was that?
Back when a 12000 GSR chassis had one line card in slot 0 for the public
Internet, and another in slot 5 for the MPLS backbone. They had to be
that far apart, for safety :-)...
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital si
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 15:49, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> > On Jun 18, 2020, at 2:28 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> > No one needs strict priority queues anymore, which was absolutely
> > needed at one point in time.
>
> What time was that?
Somewhere between 2000..2005 I personally still delivered customer
Hi,
in our region (CIS, eastern Europe) we still have issues
with overloaded international transport and bad quality of international
channels from time to time (especially at the beginning of COVID19).
While Internet looks slow, but still usable, this case VoIP goes really bad.
Our regional
> On Jun 18, 2020, at 2:28 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> No one needs strict priority queues anymore, which was absolutely
> needed at one point in time.
What time was that?
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
On 18/Jun/20 14:28, Saku Ytti wrote:
> ACK. Good Internet is almost an emergent feature, not something we
> really designed for. The main remaining problems are congested
> peerings, which is a silly political problem which ends up hurting
> customers and not helping anyone.
It's easier to ke
> I think, on the whole, as current-production routers have migrated away
> from software-based forwarding in recent years into hardware planes, as
ACK. Good Internet is almost an emergent feature, not something we
really designed for. The main remaining problems are congested
peerings, which is a
On 17/Jun/20 22:47, Dovid Bender wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My 9-5 is working for a VoIP provider. When we started in 2006 we had
> a lot of issues with the quality of the internet in eastern europe and
> central Asia. It was not rare for us to have to play around with
> routing to get the quality that we
I think all the eyeball networks moving to work with CDNs a bit better
helped alleviate the congestion on the transit / peering links. DOCSIS 3.1
helped tremendously with jitter issues as well as fiber xPON being deployed
by the telcos.
Transit costs have dropped significantly. So it doesn't seem
Yes. We have gotten a lot fo complaints today. Can't seem to nail it down.
Random PL.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:52 PM Izzy Goldstein - TeleGo <
igoldst...@telego.net> wrote:
> now you mentioned it, verizon fios is having issues in NY ?
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:50 PM Dovid Bender wrote:
>
>
now you mentioned it, verizon fios is having issues in NY ?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:50 PM Dovid Bender wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My 9-5 is working for a VoIP provider. When we started in 2006 we had a
> lot of issues with the quality of the internet in eastern europe and
> central Asia. It was not rare
12 matches
Mail list logo
