> -Original Message-
> From: "Bill Lewis"
> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:15:55
> To:
> Subject: Public Wireless access (ticket / token / schedule based)
>
> What is everyone using for enterprise grade wireless authentication for
> simple public access (i.e. users that are non-employee that
> -Original Message-
> From: ja...@jamesstewartsmith.com [mailto:ja...@jamesstewartsmith.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 11:55 AM
> To: Bill Lewis; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Public Wireless access (ticket / token / schedule based)
>
> We've had
We've had some good success with the Cisco wireless LAN controllers in our
office. The reception staff are given "Lobby Admin" access that let's them
create users with a default expiry of a day (but can go up to 90 days I think).
The wireless is technically open, but they can't do anything unti
On 12/28/2010 11:18 AM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
> Leave things wide open on a sandboxed subnet with the usual protections
> (rate limits, blocked ports), IMO is the easiest approach...
One concern in higher ed that was amplified by CALEA was the notion that
an "open" network precluded you from the pr
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert E. Seastrom [mailto:r...@seastrom.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 11:51 PM
> To: Bill Lewis
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Public Wireless access (ticket / token / schedule based)
>
> Is there some reason you can&#x
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> Assuming that this is for your offices not your retail outlets...
>
> Is there some reason you can't run it wide open without even so much
> as a captive-portal-check-the-box thing? All of the commercial boxes
> I've seen for doing wha
"Bill Lewis" writes:
> What is everyone using for enterprise grade wireless authentication for
> simple public access (i.e. users that are non-employee that need
> internet access (non-PCI) while in your building). Obviously I will hang
> this off a DMZ switch outside of my private LAN. Looking
7 matches
Mail list logo
