Re: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514

2015-07-17 Thread Jared Mauch
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:47:38AM +, Wolfgang Tremmel wrote: > > > On 17.07.2015, at 12:03, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > Some countries I know do this for their exchange points. But > > by-and-large, it is not scalable. Same goes for AS_PATH lists for peering. > > it does scale. > We do this

Re: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514

2015-07-17 Thread Mark Tinka
On 17/Jul/15 12:47, Wolfgang Tremmel wrote: > it does scale. > We do this for all our routeservers at all exchange points we operate. > In Frankfurt we have 745 peers on our routeservers. So you have prefix and AS_PATH lists for each of the members you peer with that strictly define the prefixes

Re: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514

2015-07-17 Thread Wolfgang Tremmel
> On 17.07.2015, at 12:03, Mark Tinka wrote: > > Some countries I know do this for their exchange points. But > by-and-large, it is not scalable. Same goes for AS_PATH lists for peering. it does scale. We do this for all our routeservers at all exchange points we operate. In Frankfurt we have 7

Re: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514

2015-07-16 Thread Hank Nussbacher
At 06:15 17/07/2015 +, Jürgen Jaritsch wrote: Hi, does anyone else see some prefix hijacks from AS7514? They started to announce some of our /24 Worldwide. -Hank Thanks & best regards Jürgen Jaritsch Head of Network & Infrastructure ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH Telefon

Re: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514

2015-07-16 Thread Hugo Slabbert
Seeing the same; a /19. BGPMon reports an alert at 2015-07-17 05:29 (UTC) and that it's being accepted by 2497. -- Hugo Slabbert Stargate Connections - AS19171 -Original Message- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 06:15:36 + From: Jürgen Jaritsch To: "'nanog@nanog.org'" Subject: Prefix-Hij