On 27/01/16 06:30, Mike Hammett wrote:
Google or Facebook are exactly who you would want to connect with and I'm
fairly sure they're on the route servers.
Google (AS15169) should be present on route servers at all exchanges
they're present at that have them. Generally as missing cases are
no
On 26/Jan/16 22:22, Daniel Corbe wrote:
> Some exchanges (like Equinix) do publish information about who is on their
> route servers, but they only make that information available to other
> customers.
Some exchange points provide that information publicly as well.
Different strokes.
Mark.
Someone actually sent me a list from Equinix. If it says MLPE next to the
IP address of the provider then I assume they are using the MLPE route
server, and if not I assume you have to reach out to peer with them. Does
that sound accurate?
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Bryan Socha wrote:
> Ch
Check out nl nog's the ring (they have a looking glass), routeviews or
ripe's RIS project (bgplay) being an interface to the data).You should
be able to find someone sending up bgp data to these projects that include
the route servers on different IX points.
Bryan Socha
Network Engineer
Digit
You have a couple of things to consider. Most exchanges have route servers.
Some folks peer with those and pretty much anyone can gain access to these
route servers. Not everyone peers with these however. In the large IXes it’s
typically the small to medium folks who are on the route servers.
Some exchanges run an open looking glass with BGP summary access, e.g.
DE-CIX Frankfurt route servers:
https://lg.de-cix.net/
Else you could also take a look in the common route registry databases.
Regards
Joerg
On 26 Jan 2016, at 21:09, Colton Conor wrote:
Is there a way to browse a route se
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 3:22 PM, Daniel Corbe wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 26, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to browse a route server at certain exchanges, and see who
>> is and is not on the route server?
>>
>
> Publicly? No.
>
> Best way is to peer with one and see wh
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> Is there a way to browse a route server at certain exchanges, and see who
> is and is not on the route server?
>
Publicly? No.
Best way is to peer with one and see what routes it’s giving you.
Some exchanges (like Equinix) do publish
Is there a way to browse a route server at certain exchanges, and see who
is and is not on the route server?
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
> On Tue 2016-Jan-26 13:30:41 -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> Google or Facebook are exactly who you would want to connect with and I
On Tue 2016-Jan-26 13:30:41 -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
Google or Facebook are exactly who you would want to connect with and I'm
fairly sure they're on the route servers.
...and have open peering policies with pretty low requirements.
https://peering.google.com/about/peering_policy.html
htt
...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 12:31 PM
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Peering Exchange
Google or Facebook are exactly who you would want to connect with and I'm
fairly sure they're on the route servers.
Other than driving additional revenue by needing to bu
r every new fad that comes along. They all just boil down to an
Ethernet fabric.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Ellermann"
To: "Colton Conor" , "NANOG"
Sent: Tuesday, Janu
Colton,
Sorry, hit send before I was done! You mentioned an enterprise, if that was the
case you may want to look at Equinix's Cloud Exchange. The Equinix IX is really
meant for like-minded Network operators and Content providers to exchange
routes on an exchange so that we don't require multipl
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Nick Ellermann wrote:
Colton,
We are a member on the Equinix IX. Maybe best for you to speak to an
Equinix SE on the topic, but there are two main connection methods. In
laymen's terms you can be a member on the switch and then build peering
relationships within any othe
Colton,
We are a member on the Equinix IX. Maybe best for you to speak to an Equinix SE
on the topic, but there are two main connection methods. In laymen's terms you
can be a member on the switch and then build peering relationships within any
other network that will have you. Meaning, you rea
Hi Colton,
There are three ways to peer with another entity on any exchange.
1) peer via the exchange provided route-servers.
2) peer directly with other members the exchange's provided IP address.
3) peer via a private vlan service provided by the exchange.
To setup # 1, you have to ask the p
-Original Message-
On Apr 8, 2010, at 2:08 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>3a) If no: Do participants typically preference exchange-learned
>> routes over other sources?
>>
>> Yes. As far as I know all our members set routes learned through the
>> exchange fabric higher than anything el
On Apr 8, 2010, at 2:08 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>3a) If no: Do participants typically preference exchange-learned
>> routes over other sources?
>>
>> Yes. As far as I know all our members set routes learned through the
>> exchange fabric higher than anything else. That's kind of the point
>
> 3a) If no: Do participants typically preference exchange-learned
> routes over other sources?
>
> Yes. As far as I know all our members set routes learned through the
> exchange fabric higher than anything else. That's kind of the point as
> exchange traffic is free so you always want
I operate the exchange point in the Kansas City area so I'll answer your
questions based on how we do it.
1) Is a private AS typically used for the exchange side of the session?
No. Each participant uses their own ASN.
2) Are RFC1918 IPs typically used for the p2p links into the exchange?
No.
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 11:02 -0500, Brad Fleming wrote:
> 1) Is a private AS typically used for the exchange side of the session?
Not in a typical public internet exchange. that said, there is no
reason why one could not build an exchange point that uses private ASNs.
One might do this for a spec
Some Research&Education type peering exchanges, like Pacific Wave
http://www.pacificwave.net/ , support ipv4 multicast forwarding. As
an exchange operator you'd want to support PIM-Snooping and the
ability to disable DR-Flooding to control those flows just to the
networks that joined them
On 2010-04-08, at 12:42, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
> jab...@hopcount.ca (Joe Abley) wrote:
>
>>> 1) Is a private AS typically used for the exchange side of the session?
>> No. Also many exchange points do not run route servers at all, and expect
>> participants to build bilateral BGP sessions direct
On 8-4-2010 18:02, Brad Fleming wrote:
1) Is a private AS typically used for the exchange side of the session?
No.
2) Are RFC1918 IPs typically used for the p2p links into the exchange?
No. In EU usually it is separate public /24, /23 or /22. The IPv6 range
in RIPE region for exchanges is
Re JOe,
jab...@hopcount.ca (Joe Abley) wrote:
> > 1) Is a private AS typically used for the exchange side of the session?
> No. Also many exchange points do not run route servers at all, and expect
> participants to build bilateral BGP sessions directly between each other.
...which is a shame.
On 2010-04-08, at 12:02, Brad Fleming wrote:
> 1) Is a private AS typically used for the exchange side of the session?
No. Also many exchange points do not run route servers at all, and expect
participants to build bilateral BGP sessions directly between each other.
> 2) Are RFC1918 IPs typica
On 08/04/10 18:02, Brad Fleming wrote:
> 1) Is a private AS typically used for the exchange side of the session?
No. Everybody uses his own AS number to establish sessions at peering
points.
> 2) Are RFC1918 IPs typically used for the p2p links into the exchange?
No. You usually get an IP add
27 matches
Mail list logo
