Re: Out of ideas - Comcast issue BGP peering with Tata

2023-11-22 Thread owen--- via NANOG
Depends on your definition of “RIR holder ship”. ALL (legitimate) prefixes are delegated/registered by an RIR at some level. However, some of them are non-contract and/or non-paid. APNIC is, I believe, the only RIR that eliminated all non-contract registrants. I’m not sure of the exact situatio

Re: Out of ideas - Comcast issue BGP peering with Tata

2023-11-21 Thread Gaurav Kansal via NANOG
Hi friend, Any idea how many segments are in routing table which are still not part of RIR holder ship ? Regards, Gaurav Kansal > On 22-Nov-2023, at 07:40, nanog@nanog.org wrote: > >> >>> Special note, deprecation of non-authoritative registries >>> >>> Please note that 'route' and 'route6'

Re: Out of ideas - Comcast issue BGP peering with Tata

2023-11-21 Thread owen--- via NANOG
> >> Special note, deprecation of non-authoritative registries >> >> Please note that 'route' and 'route6' objects created after 2023-Aug-15 in >> non-authoritative registries like RADB, NTTCOM, ALTDB won't be processed. It >> is recommended to create RPKI ROA objects instead. In rare cases if

Re: Out of ideas - Comcast issue BGP peering with Tata

2023-11-17 Thread Lukas Tribus
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 15:17, Jamie Chetta via NANOG wrote: > > I am out of ideas on how to get this fixed. Long story short I am a customer > of Comcast and am advertising my own /24 block I own through them. Comcast > of course BGP peers with multiple ISPs. Other ISPs are accepting my prefi

Re: Out of ideas - Comcast issue BGP peering with Tata

2023-11-17 Thread TJ Trout
> Diego > > > > *From: *NANOG on behalf of > Mike Hammett > *Date: *Friday, November 17, 2023 at 09:51 > *To: *Jamie Chetta > *Cc: *nanog@nanog.org > *Subject: *Re: Out of ideas - Comcast issue BGP peering with Tata > > This passing the buck thing was old a very long

Re: Out of ideas - Comcast issue BGP peering with Tata

2023-11-17 Thread Diego Eduardo Zorrilla Fierro (diefierr) via NANOG
Im not sure, just thinking, maybe is a thing with the /24. Is it possible to you get from Comcast maybe a /22 ?? Regards Diego From: NANOG on behalf of Mike Hammett Date: Friday, November 17, 2023 at 09:51 To: Jamie Chetta Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Out of ideas - Comcast issue BGP

Re: Out of ideas - Comcast issue BGP peering with Tata

2023-11-17 Thread Tom Beecher
> > Comcast has to be the one contacting them > This is the correct answer. It's pretty straight forward ; Comcast needs to get with Tata, say "hey, I'm announcing prefix FOO to you, your LGs don't look like you're accepting it. Can we figure out why?" On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:43 AM jim deleski

Re: Out of ideas - Comcast issue BGP peering with Tata

2023-11-17 Thread Mike Hammett
This passing the buck thing was old a very long time ago. CDNs and security services are great at it too. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Jamie Chetta via NANOG" To: n

Re: Out of ideas - Comcast issue BGP peering with Tata

2023-11-17 Thread jim deleskie
I many years ago worked at Tata, responsible for their BGP, they are giving you the right answer, Comcast has to be the one contacting them, as then both sides can see what is being sent and received and can resolve this issue. -jim On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:04 AM Jamie Chetta via NANOG wrote: