>Is the WSJ a wholly owned subsidiary of GOOG? It looks to me like a WSJ
>journalist said that.
If you read the paper, which is linked from the article and takes
about five minutes, you'll find that article is cheap clickbait and
has approximately nothing to do with the topic of the paper. As f
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, Mel Beckman wrote:
Google has always played fast and loose with its AI claims, but today t
has gone too far. In a WSJ story, Google is misleading people into
thinking it has achieved emotion, if not outright consciousness, in its
AI programming:
http://slashdot.org/submi
> Because Google is an ISP, it seems to me a legitimate discussion
> point. Given Google's penchant for crafty customer surveillance, this
> technology seems like one that Google might try to leverage into a
> snoopy product. .
if we wasted this list discussing things which *might* be leveraged in
has nothing to do with network operations. stick to reddit or slashdot.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015, 20:57 Mel Beckman wrote:
> Because Google is an ISP, it seems to me a legitimate discussion point.
> Given Google's penchant for crafty customer surveillance, this technology
> seems like one that Googl
Because Google is an ISP, it seems to me a legitimate discussion point. Given
Google's penchant for crafty customer surveillance, this technology seems like
one that Google might try to leverage into a snoopy product. .
-mel via cell
> On Jun 28, 2015, at 10:59 PM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> Don't computer scientists have a responsibility to deal forthrightly with the
> public on the real state of research in such fields as AI? When an Internet
> provider like Google makes such outlandish claims, one has to wonder what the
> rea
6 matches
Mail list logo
