On Jan 18, 2010, at 5:27 PM, Rosenberry, Eric wrote:
> Specifically Maxmind (http://www.maxmind.com/) thinks we are in Canada
My employer dealt with this recently, but I am unsure who specifically they
communicated with at MaxMind. What I did notice is that once informed of the
actual location o
On 19/01/2010 12:13, Richard Barnes wrote:
> FWIW, there has been some work in the IETF on creating protocols to
> allow pretty rich location information to be published in reverse DNS.
This would be good, but it must be remembered that this would only ever
be one clue about where a user actually
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:23:41PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> surely, with its vast talents, the ietf can make this more complex.
>
> after all, look at the inflate-and-embellish stupidity that made the
> simple idea of bgp communities for data collecion, completely ueless,
> draft-meyer-collectio
> Just to be fair here, I appreciate that there's some additional
> complexity here (not much -- I implemented a client for this yesterday
> in ~80 lines of Javascript), but LOC records don't cover everything.
> They're fine for stationary stuff, but not so great for anything that
> moves with any
Just to be fair here, I appreciate that there's some additional
complexity here (not much -- I implemented a client for this yesterday
in ~80 lines of Javascript), but LOC records don't cover everything.
They're fine for stationary stuff, but not so great for anything that
moves with any frequency
>>> Something that I have often wondered is how folks would feel about
>>> publishing some sort of geo information in reverse DNS (something like
>>> LOC records, with whatever precision you like) -- this would allow the
>>> folks that geo stuff to automagically provide the best answer, and
>>> bec
>> Something that I have often wondered is how folks would feel about
>> publishing some sort of geo information in reverse DNS (something like
>> LOC records, with whatever precision you like) -- this would allow the
>> folks that geo stuff to automagically provide the best answer, and
>> because
> Something that I have often wondered is how folks would feel about
> publishing some sort of geo information in reverse DNS (something like
> LOC records, with whatever precision you like) -- this would allow the
> folks that geo stuff to automagically provide the best answer, and
> because you c
On Jan 18, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>
> On Jan 18, 2010, at 8:22 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>> Something that I have often wondered is how folks would feel about
>> publishing some sort of geo information in reverse DNS (something like LOC
>> records, with whatever precision y
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>
> On Jan 18, 2010, at 8:22 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>> Something that I have often wondered is how folks would feel about
>> publishing some sort of geo information in reverse DNS (something like LOC
>> records, with whatever precision
On Jan 18, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2010, at 8:22 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>> Something that I have often wondered is how folks would feel about
>> publishing some sort of geo information in reverse DNS (something like LOC
>> records, with whatever precision you li
On Jan 18, 2010, at 8:22 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> Something that I have often wondered is how folks would feel about publishing
> some sort of geo information in reverse DNS (something like LOC records, with
> whatever precision you like) -- this would allow the folks that geo stuff to
> aut
On Jan 18, 2010, at 5:27 PM, Rosenberry, Eric wrote:
> I just lit up a new IP netblock (assigned directly from ARIN) and the
> companies that provide Geolocate databases do not have the correct location
> information available yet.
>
> Specifically Maxmind (http://www.maxmind.com/) thinks we a
Services such as Hulu could also be affected, certain youtube files even.
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:27:30 -0800
"Rosenberry, Eric" wrote:
I just lit up a new IP netblock (assigned directly from ARIN) and the companies
that provide Geolocate databases do not have the co
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:27:30 -0800
"Rosenberry, Eric" wrote:
> I just lit up a new IP netblock (assigned directly from ARIN) and the
> companies that provide Geolocate databases do not have the correct location
> information available yet.
>
> Specifically Maxmind (http://www.maxmind.com/) thin
Hi Eric,
On 18/01/10 14:27 -0800, Rosenberry, Eric wrote:
> So my questions to others are:
> 1. How do I get my data updated in all of the geolocate providers
> databases as quickly as possible?
> 2. What geolocate database does Google use (is it homegrown?) and how
> do I get them t
16 matches
Mail list logo
