.org] On Behalf Of Randy
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 12:14 PM
To: Peter Rocca
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: More specifics from AS18978 [was: Prefix hijack by
INDOSAT AS4795 / AS4761]
On 03/26/2015 9:00 am, Peter Rocca wrote:
+1
The summary below aligns with our analysis as well.
We&#x
On Behalf Of Nick Rose
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 3:49 PM
To: a...@djlab.com; Peter Rocca
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: More specifics from AS18978 [was: Prefix hijack by
INDOSAT AS4795 / AS4761]
This should be resolved from AS18978. If you experience anything else
please let me know
lf Of Randy
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 12:14 PM
To: Peter Rocca
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: More specifics from AS18978 [was: Prefix hijack by INDOSAT AS4795
/ AS4761]
On 03/26/2015 9:00 am, Peter Rocca wrote:
+1
The summary below aligns with our analysis as well.
We've reached out
[mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Nick Rose
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 3:49 PM
To: a...@djlab.com; Peter Rocca
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: More specifics from AS18978 [was: Prefix hijack by INDOSAT AS4795
/ AS4761]
This should be resolved from AS18978. If you experience anything
To: Peter Rocca
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: More specifics from AS18978 [was: Prefix hijack by INDOSAT AS4795
/ AS4761]
On 03/26/2015 9:00 am, Peter Rocca wrote:
> +1
>
> The summary below aligns with our analysis as well.
>
> We've reached out to AS18978 to determi
On 03/26/2015 9:00 am, Peter Rocca wrote:
+1
The summary below aligns with our analysis as well.
We've reached out to AS18978 to determine the status of the leak but
at this time we're not seeing any operational impact.
+2, after the morning coffee sunk in and helpful off list replies I can
6 matches
Mail list logo
