ts which is why certain prefixes were also seen.
Regards,
Nick Rose
CTO @ Enzu Inc.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Nick Rose
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 3:49 PM
To: a...@djlab.com; Peter Rocca
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: More specifi
On Behalf Of Nick Rose
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 3:49 PM
To: a...@djlab.com; Peter Rocca
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: More specifics from AS18978 [was: Prefix hijack by
INDOSAT AS4795 / AS4761]
This should be resolved from AS18978. If you experience anything else
please let me know
On 27/Mar/15 12:03, Job Snijders wrote:
Sure, but even that might not always prevent the fake paths from leaking
to your eBGP neighbors. For instance, not too long ago there was this
bug:
"Routes learned with the no-export community from an iBGP neighbor
are being advertised to eBGP
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:26:07PM -0400, ML wrote:
> On 3/26/2015 6:20 PM, Nick Rose wrote:
> >While investigating the issue we did find that the noction appliance
> >stopped advertising the no export community string with its
> >advertisements which is why certain prefixes were also seen.
>
> Wo
s why
certain prefixes were also seen.
Regards,
Nick Rose
CTO @ Enzu Inc.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Nick Rose
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 3:49 PM
To: a...@djlab.com; Peter Rocca
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: More specifics from AS18978
[mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Nick Rose
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 3:49 PM
To: a...@djlab.com; Peter Rocca
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: More specifics from AS18978 [was: Prefix hijack by INDOSAT AS4795
/ AS4761]
This should be resolved from AS18978. If you experience anything
To: Peter Rocca
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: More specifics from AS18978 [was: Prefix hijack by INDOSAT AS4795
/ AS4761]
On 03/26/2015 9:00 am, Peter Rocca wrote:
> +1
>
> The summary below aligns with our analysis as well.
>
> We've reached out to AS18978 to determi
On 03/26/2015 9:00 am, Peter Rocca wrote:
+1
The summary below aligns with our analysis as well.
We've reached out to AS18978 to determine the status of the leak but
at this time we're not seeing any operational impact.
+2, after the morning coffee sunk in and helpful off list replies I can
8 matches
Mail list logo
