On 24/05/10 17:28, Allan Eising wrote:
> In some ways, I find the MikroTik RouterOS routing filter syntax a little
> more powerful than Cisco's route-maps. As routing filters work the same
> way as firewall filters, you can group rules in "chains" and reuse parts
> of your filters in other filte
ce: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of "Learn RouterOS"
-Original Message-
From: Allan Eising [mailto:allan.eising+gm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 11:29 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Mikrotik BGP Question
On Sun, 23 May 2010 08:21:47 +0200, Graham Beneke wrote:
> On 2010/05/21 11:56 PM, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
>> - Mikrotik still has some memory leaks in the BGP stack somewhere,
>> causing funny issues at times.
>>
>> - Filters aren't adequate for my use, and lacking a lot on IPv4, but
>> even
* George Bonser:
>> Does this really work that well? Won't you still get loops or
>> blackholes unless the eBGP routes on all border routers are identical?
>
> As opposed to what, injecting the entire BGP table into your igp?
As opposed to just injecting defaults.
> Maybe there is a reason the
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian Weimer
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 2:35 AM
> To: George Bonser
> Cc: joel jaeggli; Ingo Flaschberger; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Mikrotik BGP Question
>
> * George Bonser:
>
>
> Does this really work that we
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Flaschberger [mailto:i...@xip.at]
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 8:56 PM
To: Lorell Hathcock
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Mikrotik BGP Question
Dear Lorell,
> We will implement OSPF.
so what arguments speak against 2 bgp upstreams?
Kind regards,
I
* George Bonser:
> Well, I believe the original poster said that one of his colleagues
> swore that BGP multihoming wouldn't work unless both feeds terminated on
> the same router. I suppose said colleague has never heard of iBGP
> between two routers of the local AS. Those two routers should pro
> -Original Message-
> From: joel jaeggli [mailto:joe...@bogus.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 10:27 PM
> To: Ingo Flaschberger
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Mikrotik BGP Question
>
> On 2010-05-23 18:55, Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
> > Dear Lorell,
&
On 2010-05-23 18:55, Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
Dear Lorell,
We will implement OSPF.
so what arguments speak against 2 bgp upstreams?
It's not an either or proposition...
ospf carries your internal routes, ibgp carries you external routes
between internal routers. you can carry default arou
Dear Lorell,
We will implement OSPF.
so what arguments speak against 2 bgp upstreams?
Kind regards,
Ingo Flaschberger
On 2010/05/21 11:56 PM, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
- Mikrotik still has some memory leaks in the BGP stack somewhere,
causing funny issues at times.
- Filters aren't adequate for my use, and lacking a lot on IPv4, but
even more on IPv4.
I haven't seen either of those issues running the v4.x s
Leviton Authorized Installer
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Flaschberger [mailto:i...@xip.at]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 6:07 PM
To: Lorell Hathcock
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Mikrotik BGP Question
Dear Lorell,
> We are putting a private PTP metro ethernet (fiber based) l
Dear Lorell,
We are putting a private PTP metro ethernet (fiber based) link between the
two locations. And both locations will have one internet connection.
this network between should be no problem,
what routing protocols do you use in your network? ospf?
Kind regards,
Ingo Flaschbe
[mailto:i...@xip.at]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 6:43 PM
To: Lorell Hathcock
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Mikrotik BGP Question
Dear Lorell,
> My question is about BGP on the Mikrotik platform. The guy who I am
> supplanting swears that we are supposed to be bringing the second in
Dear Lorell,
My question is about BGP on the Mikrotik platform. The guy who I am
supplanting swears that we are supposed to be bringing the second internet
link to the same place as the first internet link for BGP to work properly.
Obviously that is not true with major brand routers which would
Tutorial: Introduction to BGP
http://nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/abstracts.php?pt=MTQ0MSZuYW5vZzQ3&nm=nanog47
Tutorial: BGP 102
http://nanog.org/meetings/nanog48/abstracts.php?pt=MTUyMiZuYW5vZzQ4&nm=nanog48
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:BGP_Case_Studies
On 2010-05-21 14:4
On 21/05/10 13:39, Bret Clark wrote:
> On 05/21/2010 08:23 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>> I will refrain from making any smart-ass comments about Mikrotik and BGP,
>> but no: there is no reason whatever that you can't take your internet
>> feeds
>> from different locations, so long as you have a good
On Friday 21 May 2010 05:16, Lorell Hathcock wrote:
> I am inheriting a WISP network with Mikrotik equipment throughout. One of
> my first duties is to make the network multihomed. We have our first
> internet connection at one location and our second internet connection will
> be delivered at a
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 21/05/2010 13:16, Lorell Hathcock wrote:
> each other. Just make sure your boxes have enough RAM to cope with a full
> dfz feed.
note that you do NOT have to have a full feed on either location, if
your goal is simply primary/backup link
On 05/21/2010 08:23 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
I will refrain from making any smart-ass comments about Mikrotik and BGP,
but no: there is no reason whatever that you can't take your internet feeds
from different locations, so long as you have a good quality interior
network link between those two l
On 21/05/2010 13:16, Lorell Hathcock wrote:
> job just fine. (And he's the same guy that has bridged this whole network,
> so it is easy to disbelieve his opinion.)
ew. nasty.
> So here's the question. Is there something about running BGP on a Mikrotik
> platform that precludes having the inte
21 matches
Mail list logo
