Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0

2009-10-19 Thread Matthew Petach
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Serge Vautour > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP. > I'm told > > OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this reason, we are looki

Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0

2009-10-19 Thread sthaug
> > We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP. > > I'm told > > OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this reason, we are looking > > at using > > you said .. greenfield.. why use OSPF? I was thinking the same. If you run OSPF and want IPv6 some time in the

Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0

2009-10-19 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Serge Vautour wrote: > Hello, > > We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP. I'm > told > OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this reason, we are looking > at using you said .. greenfield.. why use OSPF? > only area 0. O

Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0

2009-10-19 Thread Stefan Fouant
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Serge Vautour wrote: > Hello, > > We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP. > I'm told OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. Yep, OSPF-TE uses Type 10 LSAs, which only has an area flooding scope. > For this reason, we are loo

Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0

2009-10-19 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 08:39:40AM -0700, Serge Vautour wrote: > Hello, > > We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the > IGP. I'm told OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this > reason, we are looking at?using only area 0.?Only Loopback interfaces > and p-p core?