Re: IPv6 & DNS

2007-06-30 Thread David Barak
--- JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But as said, IPv6 was designed having in mind a > smooth transition including > dual-stack. Nothing is wrong when IPv6 "alone" > doesn't work today. Is like > trying to use only gas in an engine that requires a > mix of gas and oil. It > is

Re: IPv6 & DNS

2007-06-30 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Below, in-line. Regards, Jordi > De: Stephen Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Responder a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Fecha: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:23:37 +0100 > Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: > Asunto: Re: IPv6 & DNS > > > On F

Re: IPv6 & DNS

2007-06-30 Thread Stephen Wilcox
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:57:30PM -0400, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > > This is one more reason, some OSs may not support IPv6 DNS transport, so you > need to keep dual stack. The OS, IPv6, udp/tcp and DNS are all at different layers of the protocol stack.. we are supposed to be able to seaml

Re: IPv6 & DNS

2007-06-29 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
This is one more reason, some OSs may not support IPv6 DNS transport, so you need to keep dual stack. Also, if roots/TLDs do not support yet IPv6, you will need to have at least a dual stack DNS in your network. I think in the long term we will be there, using IPv6-only in LANs, but don't see th