Re: IPv6, multihoming, and customer allocations

2010-03-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
On 2010.03.16 21:06, Steve Bertrand wrote: > On 2010.03.16 17:01, Joel Jaeggli wrote: >> >> >> On 03/16/2010 07:38 AM, Rick Ernst wrote: >>> Regurgitating the original e-mail for context and follow-up. >>> >>> General responses (some that didn't make it to the list): >>> - "There really is that m

Re: IPv6, multihoming, and customer allocations

2010-03-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
On 2010.03.16 17:01, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > > > On 03/16/2010 07:38 AM, Rick Ernst wrote: >> Regurgitating the original e-mail for context and follow-up. >> >> General responses (some that didn't make it to the list): >> - "There really is that much space, don't worry about it." >> - /48s for

Re: IPv6, multihoming, and customer allocations

2010-03-16 Thread Joel Jaeggli
On 03/16/2010 07:38 AM, Rick Ernst wrote: > Regurgitating the original e-mail for context and follow-up. > > General responses (some that didn't make it to the list): > - "There really is that much space, don't worry about it." > - /48s for those that ask for it is fine, ARIN won't ask unles

Re: IPv6, multihoming, and customer allocations

2010-03-16 Thread Owen DeLong
On Mar 16, 2010, at 7:38 AM, Rick Ernst wrote: > Regurgitating the original e-mail for context and follow-up. > > General responses (some that didn't make it to the list): > - "There really is that much space, don't worry about it." > - /48s for those that ask for it is fine, ARIN won't ask un

Re: IPv6, multihoming, and customer allocations

2010-03-16 Thread Rick Ernst
Regurgitating the original e-mail for context and follow-up. General responses (some that didn't make it to the list): - "There really is that much space, don't worry about it." - /48s for those that ask for it is fine, ARIN won't ask unless it's a bigger assignment - /52 (or /56) on smaller

Re: IPv6, multihoming, and customer allocations

2010-03-13 Thread Owen DeLong
On Mar 13, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Rick Ernst wrote: A couple of different incantations searching the archive didn't enlighten me, and I find it hard to believe this hasn't been discussed. Apologies and a request for pointers if I'm rehashing an old question. Don't have the pointers handy, but

Re: IPv6, multihoming, and customer allocations

2010-03-13 Thread Antonio Querubin
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Rick Ernst wrote: A /48 seems to be the standard end-user/multi-homed customer allocation and is the minimum allocation size from ARIN. A /32 provides 65K /48s so, in theory, we could give each of our customers a /48 and still have room for growth. A /48 also appears to be