> From: Owen DeLong
> Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 4:52 PM
>
> You might also want to look at 6connect.
>
>
I actually did recently, to potentially migrate from phpipam, but I couldn't
even drive the IPAM thing :(
Just saying, in phpipam I didn't have any trouble figuring out basic stuff
li
You might also want to look at 6connect.
Owen
> On Sep 6, 2019, at 02:05 ,
> wrote:
>
> I tried all 3 netbox, nipap and phpipam as a gui user and I like the phpipam
> the best as it has most knobs and features and is very intuitive, (can't
> comment on the api richness, yet)
> But what is
I tried all 3 netbox, nipap and phpipam as a gui user and I like the phpipam
the best as it has most knobs and features and is very intuitive, (can't
comment on the api richness, yet)
But what is strange is that none of these tools provides RT (or
extended/standard communities or even vlan for t
Many others have already recommended these, but I suggest installing test
VMs of both phpipam and nipap and seeing which works best for your use
case.
NIPAP has fairly extensive tools supporting automation for provisioning.
phpipam has a few additional functions on top of only ip address
managemen
NANOG on behalf of Mel Beckman
>
> Date: Thursday, September 5, 2019 at 10:48 AM
> To: Phillip Carroll
> Cc: nanog
> Subject: Re: IPAM recommendations
>
> I agree with Phil, Netbox is a great opens source IPAM project. We currently
> use ManageEngine, but I plan to sw
Cc: nanog
Subject: Re: IPAM recommendations
I agree with Phil, Netbox is a great opens source IPAM project. We currently
use ManageEngine, but I plan to switch to Netbox when our current license is up
for renewal. NetBox. The project is supported by Digital Ocean, which is the
kind of
I highly recommend Netbox. We use it for our Source of Truth.
From: NANOG on behalf of Mehmet Akcin
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 3:52:09 AM
To: Nuno Vieira
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: IPAM recommendations
I forgot to me
Check phpipam
[ https://phpipam.net/ | https://phpipam.net/ ]
From: "Mehmet Akcin"
To: "North American Network Operators' Group"
Sent: Thursday, 5 September, 2019 09:35:19
Subject: IPAM recommendations
Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus (almost
mu
Behalf Of
> *Andrew Latham
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 5, 2019 8:20 AM
> *Cc:* nanog
> *Subject:* Re: IPAM recommendations
>
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
>
>
> Please check the mailing list archives as a resource. I made a short list
> last time https://lath
mailto:phill...@phmgmt.com>> wrote:
https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox
From: NANOG
mailto:nanog-bounces+phillipc=phmgmt@nanog.org>>
On Behalf Of Andrew Latham
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 8:20 AM
Cc: nanog mailto:nanog@nanog.org>>
Subject: Re: IPAM recommendations
On Thu, 05 Sep 2019 21:20:19 +0900, Mehmet Akcin said:
> I was using another product till few days ago (i won’t mention name) i am
> not happy and decided to go with something open source
Can you mention why you're unhappy with the product? Price, a critical
feature that was lacking, something e
https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Andrew
Latham
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 8:20 AM
Cc: nanog
Subject: Re: IPAM recommendations
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Please check the mailing list archives as a resource. I made a short list last
time https
Please check the mailing list archives as a resource. I made a short list
last time https://lathama.net/DCIM which looks to be June 20th 2018
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:37 AM Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus
> (almost must, almost..). 40
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 2:58 AM Todd Underwood wrote:
>
> that's unkind and is taking advantage of the attention and goodwill of
> the community here. this is becoming a pattern.
>
+1 on this noisy pattern. Hire an consultant to google these things for
you.
>
* m...@beckman.org (Mel Beckman) [Thu 05 Sep 2019, 14:17 CEST]:
I don’t think this is a reasonable understanding of Nanog. Nanog
members ask each other for operational tool recommendations all the
time, and since these products are right up the alley of Nanog’s
mission — network operations — it
phpIPAM
--
J. Hellenthal
The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> On Sep 5, 2019, at 03:36, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>
>
> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus
> (almost must, almost
Lets focus on the technology. Netbox is solid. I am leaning towards this
since its open source and there is some librenms integration.
I was using another product till few days ago (i won’t mention name) i am
not happy and decided to go with something open source
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 21:16 Mel
Todd,
I don’t think this is a reasonable understanding of Nanog. Nanog members ask
each other for operational tool recommendations all the time, and since these
products are right up the alley of Nanog’s mission — network operations — it’s
a perfectly reasonable use of Nanog.
But you read a si
i don't think that this is a reasonable use of nanog. if you have research
to present and then a question to ask, that's totally great. this is
especially true if you can add evaluative criteria and information before
asking questions from people who have relevant experience.
you read a single w
I forgot to mention Netbox https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox
integration (of some kind ) with LibreNMS is plus
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:51 PM Nuno Vieira wrote:
> Check phpipam
>
> https://phpipam.net/
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *"Mehmet Akcin"
> *To: *"North Amer
Not much beyond this,
https://appuals.com/the-5-best-ip-address-management-ipam-software/
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:39 PM Todd Underwood wrote:
> What have you evaluated so far? Can you share your evaluation grid, how
> you selected the candidates, how you are weighting criteria and specific
> i
What have you evaluated so far? Can you share your evaluation grid, how
you selected the candidates, how you are weighting criteria and specific
interesting findings so far?
Thanks!
t
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:37 AM Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source
Subject: IPAM recommendations Date: Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:35:19PM +0900
Quoting Mehmet Akcin (meh...@akcin.net):
> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus
> (almost must, almost..). 40-50K IPs to be managed.
nipap
infoblox if you are an enterprise needing AD her
23 matches
Mail list logo
