Replicating to public list the suggestions I've received on private:
- PHPIPAM > Administration > phpIPAM settings >Section:"Feature Settings"
and enable the PSTN module
- https://github.com/iDebugAll/phonebox_plugin
Thanks!
Em seg., 27 de mar. de 2023 às 16:16, Douglas Fischer <
fischerdoug...@g
> From: Owen DeLong
> Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 4:52 PM
>
> You might also want to look at 6connect.
>
>
I actually did recently, to potentially migrate from phpipam, but I couldn't
even drive the IPAM thing :(
Just saying, in phpipam I didn't have any trouble figuring out basic stuff
li
You might also want to look at 6connect.
Owen
> On Sep 6, 2019, at 02:05 ,
> wrote:
>
> I tried all 3 netbox, nipap and phpipam as a gui user and I like the phpipam
> the best as it has most knobs and features and is very intuitive, (can't
> comment on the api richness, yet)
> But what is
I tried all 3 netbox, nipap and phpipam as a gui user and I like the phpipam
the best as it has most knobs and features and is very intuitive, (can't
comment on the api richness, yet)
But what is strange is that none of these tools provides RT (or
extended/standard communities or even vlan for t
Many others have already recommended these, but I suggest installing test
VMs of both phpipam and nipap and seeing which works best for your use
case.
NIPAP has fairly extensive tools supporting automation for provisioning.
phpipam has a few additional functions on top of only ip address
managemen
NANOG on behalf of Mel Beckman
>
> Date: Thursday, September 5, 2019 at 10:48 AM
> To: Phillip Carroll
> Cc: nanog
> Subject: Re: IPAM recommendations
>
> I agree with Phil, Netbox is a great opens source IPAM project. We currently
> use ManageEngine, but I plan to sw
Cc: nanog
Subject: Re: IPAM recommendations
I agree with Phil, Netbox is a great opens source IPAM project. We currently
use ManageEngine, but I plan to switch to Netbox when our current license is up
for renewal. NetBox. The project is supported by Digital Ocean, which is the
kind of
I highly recommend Netbox. We use it for our Source of Truth.
From: NANOG on behalf of Mehmet Akcin
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 3:52:09 AM
To: Nuno Vieira
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: IPAM recommendations
I forgot to me
Check phpipam
[ https://phpipam.net/ | https://phpipam.net/ ]
From: "Mehmet Akcin"
To: "North American Network Operators' Group"
Sent: Thursday, 5 September, 2019 09:35:19
Subject: IPAM recommendations
Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus (almost
mu
Behalf Of
> *Andrew Latham
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 5, 2019 8:20 AM
> *Cc:* nanog
> *Subject:* Re: IPAM recommendations
>
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
>
>
> Please check the mailing list archives as a resource. I made a short list
> last time https://lath
mailto:phill...@phmgmt.com>> wrote:
https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox
From: NANOG
mailto:nanog-bounces+phillipc=phmgmt@nanog.org>>
On Behalf Of Andrew Latham
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 8:20 AM
Cc: nanog mailto:nanog@nanog.org>>
Subject: Re: IPAM recommendations
On Thu, 05 Sep 2019 21:20:19 +0900, Mehmet Akcin said:
> I was using another product till few days ago (i won’t mention name) i am
> not happy and decided to go with something open source
Can you mention why you're unhappy with the product? Price, a critical
feature that was lacking, something e
https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Andrew
Latham
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 8:20 AM
Cc: nanog
Subject: Re: IPAM recommendations
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Please check the mailing list archives as a resource. I made a short list last
time https
Please check the mailing list archives as a resource. I made a short list
last time https://lathama.net/DCIM which looks to be June 20th 2018
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:37 AM Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus
> (almost must, almost..). 40
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 2:58 AM Todd Underwood wrote:
>
> that's unkind and is taking advantage of the attention and goodwill of
> the community here. this is becoming a pattern.
>
+1 on this noisy pattern. Hire an consultant to google these things for
you.
>
* m...@beckman.org (Mel Beckman) [Thu 05 Sep 2019, 14:17 CEST]:
I don’t think this is a reasonable understanding of Nanog. Nanog
members ask each other for operational tool recommendations all the
time, and since these products are right up the alley of Nanog’s
mission — network operations — it
phpIPAM
--
J. Hellenthal
The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> On Sep 5, 2019, at 03:36, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>
>
> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus
> (almost must, almost
Lets focus on the technology. Netbox is solid. I am leaning towards this
since its open source and there is some librenms integration.
I was using another product till few days ago (i won’t mention name) i am
not happy and decided to go with something open source
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 21:16 Mel
Todd,
I don’t think this is a reasonable understanding of Nanog. Nanog members ask
each other for operational tool recommendations all the time, and since these
products are right up the alley of Nanog’s mission — network operations — it’s
a perfectly reasonable use of Nanog.
But you read a si
i don't think that this is a reasonable use of nanog. if you have research
to present and then a question to ask, that's totally great. this is
especially true if you can add evaluative criteria and information before
asking questions from people who have relevant experience.
you read a single w
I forgot to mention Netbox https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox
integration (of some kind ) with LibreNMS is plus
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:51 PM Nuno Vieira wrote:
> Check phpipam
>
> https://phpipam.net/
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *"Mehmet Akcin"
> *To: *"North Amer
Not much beyond this,
https://appuals.com/the-5-best-ip-address-management-ipam-software/
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:39 PM Todd Underwood wrote:
> What have you evaluated so far? Can you share your evaluation grid, how
> you selected the candidates, how you are weighting criteria and specific
> i
What have you evaluated so far? Can you share your evaluation grid, how
you selected the candidates, how you are weighting criteria and specific
interesting findings so far?
Thanks!
t
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:37 AM Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source
Subject: IPAM recommendations Date: Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:35:19PM +0900
Quoting Mehmet Akcin (meh...@akcin.net):
> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus
> (almost must, almost..). 40-50K IPs to be managed.
nipap
infoblox if you are an enterprise needing AD her
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 06:09:02 PM Dave Bell wrote:
> VRFs are not horrible hacks.
Except when operators stress them to the limit by running
the full Internet table inside them. But this is one of
those religious arguments.
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mess
It depends on the service you are providing. If its fully managed up to the
customer premises, I fail to see how you can get away without knowing what
addressing the customer is using.
On 14 May 2014 17:16, wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:09:02 +0100, Dave Bell said:
>
> > People use VRF's to pro
On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:09:02 +0100, Dave Bell said:
> People use VRF's to provide Layer3 VPNs to customers. Customers
> typically use overlapping address space in their networks.
That's the customer's problem inside their networks. If you have
overlapping address space in *your own greenfield* n
On 14 May 2014 16:14, wrote:
> On 2014-05-13 16:37, Kyle Leissner wrote:
> RFC
>>
>> 1918,
>
>
> ewww. v6 sir! Greenfield network and everything.
>
>> VRF, Overlapping Address Space,
>
>
> ewww again. Those are horrible hacks, v6 all the things.
People use VRF's to provide Layer3 VPNs to custom
On 2014-05-13 16:37, Kyle Leissner wrote:
I would like recommendations on the following software/hardware
elements required to run an access network. Assume you are building a
greenfield network using a combination of access technologies such as
DSL, GPON, AE, and WiFi.
What a timely thread! W
hey,
Subscriber Management/BRAS/BNG: Redback was the big player back in the day, but
I believe they are no longer. Juniper has their Subscriber Management feature
pack on their MX routers, and Cisco has their Broadband Network Gateway on
their ASR routers. Besides these two vendors I am not s
Raj Jalan is right
2013/8/12 Raj Jalan
> If you are using Postgresql with Northstar, you should be able to export
> data to csv with a command like following:
>
> COPY table_name TO '/tmp/file_name.csv' DELIMITER ',' CSV HEADER;
>
> If you are using mysql as your DB in Northstart, you can do so
If you are using Postgresql with Northstar, you should be able to export
data to csv with a command like following:
COPY table_name TO '/tmp/file_name.csv' DELIMITER ',' CSV HEADER;
If you are using mysql as your DB in Northstart, you can do something like
this to create a CSV file:
SELECT *
INT
I don´t know Northstar, but if you can export their tables into a *.csv,
you can easily import it into http://www.gestioip.net/
Michael
Am 07.08.2013 18:41, schrieb Natambu Obleton:
> I have customer that we deployed Northstar for their internal ip management
> over 8 yrs ago. They are still usi
+1 on 6connect here as well.
Best regards,
Florian
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Sander Steffann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I'm pretty sure that if 6connect doesn't have an existing tool to import
>> Northstar that they'd work with your client to get it done.
>
> +1 on 6connect. Very helpful people th
Hi,
> I'm pretty sure that if 6connect doesn't have an existing tool to import
> Northstar that they'd work with your client to get it done.
+1 on 6connect. Very helpful people there :-)
Sander
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013, Natambu Obleton wrote:
I have customer that we deployed Northstar for their internal ip
management over 8 yrs ago. They are still using it, but it is slowly
breaking on them. Can someone recommend an IPAM solution that has a
Northstar import option? They have hundreds of en
IPPlan currently does have IPv6 functionality, but we're still on BETA
phase. The BETA is pretty stable and feature rich, but we're have some
work to do before we officially release it.
BETA version can be found on:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/iptrack/files/
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:10 AM, l
We want to go with incognito ipam solution.
http://www.incognito.com/products/address-commander/
2010/4/26 Phil Regnauld
> Michael Hertrick (mike.hertrick) writes:
> >
> > I found netdot recently. It's a work in progress, but is coming along.
> > IPAM (with v6 support) is just one component; i
Michael Hertrick (mike.hertrick) writes:
>
> I found netdot recently. It's a work in progress, but is coming along.
> IPAM (with v6 support) is just one component; it has a lot of other
> features and uses as well, too many to list here. Just check out the
> web site:
>
> http://netdot.uoregon
On 4/26/10 9:20 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
> Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> On 2010.04.26 12:13, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
>>> We've been using IPplan for about 5 years pretty effectively. It
>>> could use a UI refresh but it's decent.
>>
>> Does not do v6.
>>
>
> Their site says that the beta supports IPv
You can use:
BLUECAT NETWORKS solution
http://www.bluecatnetworks.com/
You can buy it in a VM mode or appliance mode.
I'm wondering what the service providers are using for IPAM. We are looking
at having to manage both v4 and v6 address space and delegate internally to
other people.
I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bryan Fields wrote:
> I've looked at infoblox, but we can't justify spending 400k at this point.
> It's a lovely solution though.
Same here...
> Is anyone running IPplan? http://iptrack.sourceforge.net/ I looked at it
> before, and at the time it'
Steve Bertrand wrote:
On 2010.04.26 12:13, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
We've been using IPplan for about 5 years pretty effectively. It could use a UI
refresh but it's decent.
Does not do v6.
Their site says that the beta supports IPv6.
Jack
On 2010.04.26 12:13, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> We've been using IPplan for about 5 years pretty effectively. It could use a
> UI refresh but it's decent.
Does not do v6.
Steve
>> Is anyone running IPplan? http://iptrack.sourceforge.net/ I looked at it
>> before, and at the time it's support of V6 was lacking. Is anyone running
>> this in a SP environment with v6?
> Check out tipp:
> http://tipp.tobez.org/
TIPP appears to not have IPv6 support at this time.
Best,
Bil
We've been using IPplan for about 5 years pretty effectively. It could use a UI
refresh but it's decent.
-J
Jason J. W. Williams, COO/CTO
DigiTar
william...@digitar.com
V: 208.343.8520
F: 208.322.8522
M: 208.863.0727
www.digitar.com
On Apr 26, 2010, at 10:08 AM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
On 26/04/2010, at 17.57, Bryan Fields wrote:
Is anyone running IPplan? http://iptrack.sourceforge.net/ I looked
at it
before, and at the time it's support of V6 was lacking. Is anyone
running
this in a SP environment with v6?
Any other OSS tools for this people are using?
Check out t
47 matches
Mail list logo
