Nanog Politics [was: Re: Eisenach & the FCC - was: [Re: Here we go again.]]

2016-11-14 Thread Alexander Maassen
> on > behalf of Mel Beckman mailto:m...@beckman.org>> > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 10:37 PM > To: sur...@mauigateway.com<mailto:sur...@mauigateway.com> > Cc: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: Eisenach & the FCC - was: [Re: Here we go

Re: Eisenach & the FCC - was: [Re: Here we go again.]

2016-11-13 Thread Scott Weeks
--- m...@beckman.org wrote: From: Mel Beckman This is discussing politics, not the "operational and technical issues" of NANOG's charter. --- BTW, I didn't mean it to be talking politics. He was mentioned in the current discussion, I looked into a li

Re: Eisenach & the FCC - was: [Re: Here we go again.]

2016-11-13 Thread Mel Beckman
behalf of Mel Beckman mailto:m...@beckman.org>> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 10:37 PM To: sur...@mauigateway.com<mailto:sur...@mauigateway.com> Cc: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Eisenach & the FCC - was: [Re: Here we go again.] Before this snowball g

Re: Eisenach & the FCC - was: [Re: Here we go again.]

2016-11-13 Thread Rod Beck
: sur...@mauigateway.com Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Eisenach & the FCC - was: [Re: Here we go again.] Before this snowball gets any bigger, I would like to reiterate the previous commenter calling for this present political discussion to move elsewhere. Here's the NANOG AUP we've

Re: Eisenach & the FCC - was: [Re: Here we go again.]

2016-11-13 Thread Mel Beckman
Before this snowball gets any bigger, I would like to reiterate the previous commenter calling for this present political discussion to move elsewhere. Here's the NANOG AUP we've all agreed to: NANOG Acceptable Use Policy * Discussion will focus on Internet operational and technical issues as