Yeah, that's about right. When I had one fail that was not set in power
saver mode, it just shut off intermittently before letting out the genie.
When I had one go out while it was in energy saver mode, it continued to
operate but put out a weak ~80Vrms with heavy distortion that caused
equipment d
Note the EATON Press release. Maybe the "burn on the bench" is the way
they get to the California energy reduction Standards? If it isn't
working it isn't using power.
Date: 23 October 2012
Latest Eaton Thought Leadership White Paper Provides Technical Analysis
of Eaton's Energy Saver System
Are these UPS units going inside the racks? Would it not be better to do
something in the power room with an inverter on the circuits that feed the
racks, such as a large Outback unit with sufficient battery capacity?
http://www.amazon.com/OutBack-Inverter-3600-Watts-Volt/dp/B002MWAAYU
With one de
I've had issues and experience with many types of UPSes, including HP (probably
OEM'd from someone else), APC, EATON/Powerware, and Liebert/Emerson. I keep
coming back to APC. Solid units, and are always slightly 'ahead' in
technology. Sure, I've seen each model have failures and even faults
> Just go -48vdc. None of these pesky UPS problems :)
Well, you still have 1/2 the UPS - the inverter section. It's not a silver
bullet.
On 11/13/12 6:49 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 6:42 PM, Tom Morris wrote:
>> Sorry to say, I've used them and had them eat themselves. They just
>> die mysteriously and let out lots of smoke when they do. When they do,
>> however, they leave behind a perfectly good set of batteries. I'd
>> r
Just go -48vdc.
None of these pesky UPS problems :)
Unfortunately there's a serious lack of PoE switches that are -48.
On Nov 13, 2012 8:51 PM, "Jeff Kell" wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 6:42 PM, Tom Morris wrote:
> > Sorry to say, I've used them and had them eat themselves. They just
> > die mysteriou
On 11/13/2012 6:42 PM, Tom Morris wrote:
> Sorry to say, I've used them and had them eat themselves. They just
> die mysteriously and let out lots of smoke when they do. When they do,
> however, they leave behind a perfectly good set of batteries. I'd
> recommend looking elsewhere... Does Eaton/Pow
Alex wrote:
We have quite alot of Eaton UPS's in our network, all sorts of models.
There have been no problems from what I've seen, except when you add
water from a broken pipe or bad roof.
We've had the once in a blue moon management card reset as Adrian said
but it didn't interrupt our equipme
We have quite alot of Eaton UPS's in our network, all sorts of models.
There have been no problems from what I've seen, except when you add
water from a broken pipe or bad roof.
We've had the once in a blue moon management card reset as Adrian said
but it didn't interrupt our equipment.
On 1
Adrian wrote:
We have several 5130 and 9125 models (2kVA rackmount), never given us a
problem in years of service... Well, one network management card that lost
its mind, reset the configuration and went on with life, but the UPS just
chugged along. Biggest plus has been that they don't cook thei
Sorry to say, I've used them and had them eat themselves. They just
die mysteriously and let out lots of smoke when they do. When they do,
however, they leave behind a perfectly good set of batteries. I'd
recommend looking elsewhere... Does Eaton/PowerWare still make the
FerrUPS series? Those were
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 12:59, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
> they've worked out for you.
>
> I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
> since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does s
On 11/13/12 1:20 PM, Blake Dunlap wrote:
> As a side note, how do you call a UPS "online" if it stays on bypass most
> of the time, and throws out of "bypass" to go to battery?
>
It's a selectable feature. I was probably going to set it to true online
mode, but play with the other mode for curios
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
>> From: Blake Dunlap
>> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:35 -0600
>>_
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Mike A wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:59:18AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>> > > Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for any
Hi Seth,
A previous employer we looked at a few UPS.
We used Emerson GXT2/3 3Kva UPSs and they worked a treat.
We also tried the Eaton 9130 and we never had any problems with them, but the
SNMP monitoring was only good for telling you if there was a problem, not what
the problem was. So we even
> From: Blake Dunlap
> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:35 -0600
>_
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Mike A wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:59:18AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> > > Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
> > > they've worked out for you.
> > >
As a side note, how do you call a UPS "online" if it stays on bypass most
of the time, and throws out of "bypass" to go to battery?
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Mike A wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:59:18AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> > Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anyth
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:59:18AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
> they've worked out for you.
>
> I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
> since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and als
At 02:59 PM 11/13/2012, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
they've worked out for you.
I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
high efficienc
20 matches
Mail list logo
