On 24/08/11 2:46 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Seth Mattinen"
I'll scratch "no earthquakes" off the list of benefits for the east
coast over the west coast. ;)
A very early blogger buddy of mine owned a stake, for a while, in a colo in
Knoxville TN, which was, they
On Aug 24, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>> From: "Patrick W. Gilmore"
>
>> On Aug 24, 2011, at 8:55 AM, JC Dill wrote:
>>> On 23/08/11 3:13 PM, William Herrin wrote:
A. Our structures aren't built to seismic zone standards. Our
construction workers aren't familiar with*how* to
- Original Message -
> From: "Patrick W. Gilmore"
> On Aug 24, 2011, at 8:55 AM, JC Dill wrote:
> > On 23/08/11 3:13 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> >> A. Our structures aren't built to seismic zone standards. Our
> >> construction workers aren't familiar with*how* to build to seismic
> >> zo
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Roy wrote:
Many years ago I was taught that "earthquake proof" means the building
doesn't kill the occupants and not that the structure survives unscathed..
As examples, they used a hospital that was damaged in the magnitude 6.6
Sylmar quake of 1971 The building was basica
On 25/08/2011 9:58 p.m., Mark Foster wrote:
This is a cynical approach to what happened, in my (Auckland based)
opinion. In the early stages information would've been relatively
hard to come by, responders were very much in an all-hands-to-the-pump
running-on-instinct phase and the scale of th
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Mark Foster wrote:
Radio - That was very interesting to observe. Clearly radio stations don't
have disaster broadcast plans in place for content. When you're crying out
for information about what's going on, the very last think you want to hear
is an inappropriate adve
Radio - That was very interesting to observe. Clearly radio stations don't
have disaster broadcast plans in place for content. When you're crying out
for information about what's going on, the very last think you want to hear
is an inappropriate advert break. The number of stations that kept
On 25/08/2011 12:18 p.m., Michael Painter wrote:
So the "old corded phones" were to be distributed to those who have
copper/POTS service?
I assume so. I honestly don't know where the phones went exactly. Most
people still have a copper pots service here (though that is changing).
Kinda'
On 8/24/2011 7:18 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Leigh Porter wrote:
Indeed, we are not going to be building earthquake proof buildings in
London for example.
Of course there is no such thing as earthquake proof. The Earth is
still a single point of failure :-)
Essential faci
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Leigh Porter wrote:
Indeed, we are not going to be building earthquake proof buildings in
London for example.
Of course there is no such thing as earthquake proof. The Earth is still
a single point of failure :-)
Essential facilty design usally takes the "standard" desi
Don Gould wrote:
Many many people use cordless phones and don't have a non-powered/corded
phone any more.
After the 22nd we had a national campaign to get old corded phones to
Christchurch. 5,000 were collected. (Now when you consider the country
has a population of 4m and Christchurch has ~36
:44 2011
Subject: Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011
- Original Message -
> From: "Seth Mattinen"
> I'll scratch "no earthquakes" off the list of benefits for the east
> coast over the west coast. ;)
A very early blogger buddy of mine owned a stake, f
- Original Message -
> From: "Seth Mattinen"
> I'll scratch "no earthquakes" off the list of benefits for the east
> coast over the west coast. ;)
A very early blogger buddy of mine owned a stake, for a while, in a colo in
Knoxville TN, which was, they said, out of *all* the hazard plane
On 25/08/2011 12:27 a.m., Scott Morris wrote:
Also, the quake on the east coast was much closer to the surface than
most west coast quakes, which could account for the feeling.
Scott (not a geologist)
/me is also not a geologist, but does live in the east part of
Christchurch, New Zealand.
On 8/24/11 6:44 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2011, at 8:55 AM, JC Dill wrote:
>> On 23/08/11 3:13 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>>> A. Our structures aren't built to seismic zone standards. Our
>>> construction workers aren't familiar with*how* to build to seismic
>>> zone standards. We
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> A 5.8 (or 5.9, I've seen conflicting numbers) really isn't likely to do all
> that much damage, even on the East Coast.
>
A 5.6 quake in Newcastle, Australia in 1989 caused, according to Wikipedia,
"13 fatalities, 160 people hospitalised, 300
On Aug 24, 2011, at 9:44 20AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2011, at 8:55 AM, JC Dill wrote:
>> On 23/08/11 3:13 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>>> A. Our structures aren't built to seismic zone standards. Our
>>> construction workers aren't familiar with*how* to build to seismic
>>> zone
- Original Message -
> From: "JC Dill"
> On 23/08/11 3:13 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> > A. Our structures aren't built to seismic zone standards. Our
> > construction workers aren't familiar with*how* to build to seismic
> > zone standards. We don't secure equipment inside our buildings t
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 05:55, JC Dill wrote:
> On 23/08/11 3:13 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>>
>> A. Our structures aren't built to seismic zone standards. Our
>> construction workers aren't familiar with*how* to build to seismic
>> zone standards. We don't secure equipment inside our buildings to
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick W. Gilmore [mailto:patr...@ianai.net]
> Sent: 24 August 2011 14:46
> To: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011
>
> On Aug 24, 2011, at 8:55 AM, JC Dill wrote:
> > On 23/08/11 3:13 PM, William Herrin wr
On Aug 24, 2011, at 8:55 AM, JC Dill wrote:
> On 23/08/11 3:13 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>> A. Our structures aren't built to seismic zone standards. Our
>> construction workers aren't familiar with*how* to build to seismic
>> zone standards. We don't secure equipment inside our buildings to
>> s
On 23/08/11 3:13 PM, William Herrin wrote:
A. Our structures aren't built to seismic zone standards. Our
construction workers aren't familiar with*how* to build to seismic
zone standards. We don't secure equipment inside our buildings to
seismic zone standards.
They should be.
They should be.
Also, the quake on the east coast was much closer to the surface than
most west coast quakes, which could account for the feeling.
Scott (not a geologist)
On 8/23/11 6:13 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> A 5.8 (or 5.9, I've seen conflicting numb
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Lamar Owen wrote:
At the time I wondered if anything near the IX's in that area might be
impacted,
Although any Internet Exchange Facility can have bad luck (i.e. remember
the Ashburn data center damaged by a hurricane/tornado in 2004), most of
the major IX's in the US ar
On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 06:13:02 PM William Herrin wrote:
> B. The crust on the east coast is much more solid than on the west
> coast, so the seismic waves propagate much further. Los Angeles
> doesn't feel an earthquake north of San Francisco unless it's huge.
> New York City felt this earthq
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> A 5.8 (or 5.9, I've seen conflicting numbers)
Hi Owen,
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/se082311a.html#details
Originally reported as 5.8. Briefly upped to 5.9. Now back to 5.8.
> really isn't likely to do all
> tha
On 08/23/2011 02:48 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
A 5.8 (or 5.9, I've seen conflicting numbers) really isn't likely to do all
that much damage, even on the East Coast. In California, anyone who
has lived here for more than 10 years probably doesn't even feel
anything less than a 5, and, it takes a solid
A 5.8 (or 5.9, I've seen conflicting numbers) really isn't likely to do all
that much damage, even on the East Coast. In California, anyone who
has lived here for more than 10 years probably doesn't even feel
anything less than a 5, and, it takes a solid 6 to really get anyone's
attention out here.
2:58:42 PM
Subject: Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Mike Gatti
wrote:
5.9 Epicenter in Virginia:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/Quakes/usc0005ild.php#summary
Seeing slow internet access out of ASHBURN, VA data centers.
Verizon and
Globa
T-Mobile is completely out in Bethesda, MD. No voice or data signal whatsoever.
- Original Message -
From: "Jared Geiger"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 2:58:42 PM
Subject: Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Mike Ga
On 8/23/2011 12:43 PM, PC wrote:
Based on a sampling of thousands of cable modems, dsl, and cellular sites in
the DC area:
With a 10 second keepalive/30 second holdtime, I only saw, maybe, 2-3 sites
disappear per thousand based on an endpoint in Ashburn, VA. I do see some
delay cellular side, b
Based on a sampling of thousands of cable modems, dsl, and cellular sites in
the DC area:
With a 10 second keepalive/30 second holdtime, I only saw, maybe, 2-3 sites
disappear per thousand based on an endpoint in Ashburn, VA. I do see some
delay cellular side, but it looks to be solely congestion
A friend about 80 miles near the epicenter says phones are down but
Comcast Internet, by way of some miracle, is up
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Mike Gatti wrote:
> 5.9 Epicenter in Virginia:
>
>
> http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/Quakes/usc0005ild.php#summary
>
> Seeing slow internet access out of ASHBURN, VA data centers. Verizon and
> Global Crossing. Carriers circuits probably overwhe
5.9 Epicenter in Virginia:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/Quakes/usc0005ild.php#summary
Seeing slow internet access out of ASHBURN, VA data centers. Verizon and Global
Crossing. Carriers circuits probably overwhelmed with voice/data.
I do not have any info on outages or dama
23 14:37:41 2011
Subject: Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011
We had some cell tower issues here in NJ.
chris
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Sule, Mohammed wrote:
> Have anyone seen or feel any effect of this on their network?
>
>
> -
> V
On Aug 23, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Sule, Mohammed wrote:
> Have anyone seen or feel any effect of this on their network?
Yes.
Users going to twitter, IRC, Facebook, Google+, etc., are WAY WAY WAY up.
Ditto news sources.
Oh, and of course, XKCD. :)
--
TTFN,
patrick
We had some cell tower issues here in NJ.
chris
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Sule, Mohammed wrote:
> Have anyone seen or feel any effect of this on their network?
>
>
> -
> Visit www.nyc.gov/hhc
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this E-Mai
39 matches
Mail list logo
