> -Original Message-
> From: John Curran [mailto:jcur...@arin.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:56 AM
> To: Eric J Esslinger
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Operators' Group
> Subject: Re: Dnssec and ptr records
>
>
> (Presuming, of course, that you've g
(Presuming, of course, that you've got an ARIN assignment
or allocation. If you're in a provider-assigned block,
you'll need to chat with your ISP about the DS linkage
for your PTR zones... /John )
On Oct 18, 2011, at 12:31 PM, John Curran wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Eric J Esslinger
On Oct 18, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Eric J Esslinger wrote:
> Well it makes sense we should, just that all the examples, discussion, and
> such I've read dealt with forward records.
>
> I guess I get to dig some more. Thanks.
Eric -
Your in-addr zone first needs to be signed and then the DS
record
At 9:13 -0500 10/18/11, Eric J Esslinger wrote:
Are we supposed to setup signing for reverse dns zones?
To the DNS, a zone is a zone. The terms "forward" and "reverse" as
zone adjectives were invented by humans. ;)
The high-level view of signing the "reverse zones" is the same as for
"for
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:13:54AM -0500, Eric J Esslinger wrote:
> Quick question for those who have researched things more closely. I have
> signed all my forward zones and think I've crossed my I's and dotted my T's,
> but one thing I'm not sure of...
>
> Are we supposed to setup signing for
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Regnauld [mailto:regna...@nsrc.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:18 AM
> To: Eric J Esslinger
> Cc: 'nanog@nanog.org'
> Subject: Re: Dnssec and ptr records
>
>
> Eric J Esslinger (eesslinger) writes:
> > Q
Eric J Esslinger (eesslinger) writes:
> Quick question for those who have researched things more closely. I have
> signed all my forward zones and think I've crossed my I's and dotted my T's,
> but one thing I'm not sure of...
>
> Are we supposed to setup signing for reverse dns zones?
> Are we supposed to setup signing for reverse dns zones?
yes
8 matches
Mail list logo