On Aug 5, 2009, at 10:20 PM, Erik Soosalu wrote:
Multiple systems end up with problems.
Yes, and again, I'm not advocating this approach. I just think it's
most likely where we're going to end up, long-term.
---
Roland D
On Aug 5, 2009, at 10:11 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
For all it's short comings the DNS and the single namespace it
brings is much better than
having a multitude of namespaces.
I agree with you, but I don't think this approach is going to persist
as the standard model.
Increasingly, trans
Multiple systems end up with problems. Even standard DNS blows up when
some company (Apple) decides that an extension (.local) should not be
forwarded to the DNS servers on some device (iPhone) because their
service (Bonjour) uses it.
Thanks,
Erik
-Original Message-
From: Roland Dobbins
In message <825c8ac7-c01e-4934-92fd-e7b9e8091...@arbor.net>, Roland Dobbins wri
tes:
>
> On Aug 5, 2009, at 9:32 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> > We might have an alternative one day, but it's going to happen by
> > accident, through generalization of an internal naming service
> > employed b
4 matches
Mail list logo
