Patrick,
I'd contend that using Cogent is a good way to reduce your cost of
doing business while maintaining an acceptable level of service, not
to necessarily improve reach. If your network absolutely must have the
best routes you may be better off adding some other providers
regardless.
Best re
On Jan 12, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
Mike,
Aside from the occasional peering wars i've never had or
witnessed any
serious issues with Cogent. If you want some redundancy you mi
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>> Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
>>> Mike,
>>> Aside from the occasional peering wars i've never had or witnessed any
>>> serious issues with Cogent. If you want some redundancy you might also
>>> try some other similarly priced pr
On Jan 12, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
Mike,
Aside from the occasional peering wars i've never had or witnessed
any
serious issues with Cogent. If you want some redundancy you might
also
try some other si
On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
Mike,
Aside from the occasional peering wars i've never had or witnessed
any
serious issues with Cogent. If you want some redundancy you might
also
try some other similarly priced providers like WBS Connect, HE, or
BtN.
joe mcguckin wrote:
So, you're essentially getting paid peering from Cogent then ?
I guess you could do that. Normally I'd just throw it in the mix with
the rest and let BGP figure it out if there's another depeering.
~Seth
So, you're essentially getting paid peering from Cogent then ?
Joe McGuckin
ViaNet Communications
j...@via.net
650-207-0372 cell
650-213-1302 office
650-969-2124 fax
On Jan 12, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
Mike,
Aside from the occasional peering wars i've ne
7 matches
Mail list logo
