On Oct 24, 2012 12:40 AM, "Daniël W. Crompton"
wrote:
>
> On 24 October 2012 08:35, Masataka Ohta wrote:
>
> > (2012/10/24 12:29), Rodrick Brown wrote:
> > > "With coded TCP, blocks of packets are clumped together and then
> > > transformed into algebraic equations that describe the packets. If
>
On 24 October 2012 08:35, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> (2012/10/24 12:29), Rodrick Brown wrote:
> > "With coded TCP, blocks of packets are clumped together and then
> > transformed into algebraic equations that describe the packets. If
> > part of the message is lost, the receiver can solve the equation
(2012/10/24 12:29), Rodrick Brown wrote:
> "With coded TCP, blocks of packets are clumped together and then
> transformed into algebraic equations that describe the packets. If
> part of the message is lost, the receiver can solve the equation to
> derive the missing data.
Don't do that.
> MIT fo
I understand and believe in the value of erasure coding, though I want to see
the latency effects here. But that model was very detailed view into an overly
simple (to the point of operationally unrealistic) model. Bad example, for a
research paper.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
George Herbert wrote:
Modeled with just simple FTP sessions?
Ugh: they admitted to having MIT backbone packet traces to analyze, and then
used that simple of a simulator...
The practical benefits of the technology, known as coded TCP, were seen on a recent test run on a New York-to-Boston Ac
Modeled with just simple FTP sessions?
Ugh: they admitted to having MIT backbone packet traces to analyze, and then
used that simple of a simulator...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 23, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Rodrick Brown wrote:
> "With coded TCP, blocks of packets are clumped
6 matches
Mail list logo
