William Pitcock wrote:
> Anyway, I was just wondering what the general consensus of NANOG is
> regarding CentOS vs Scientific Linux. SL generally has faster security
> updates and people are *paid* to work on it fulltime. CentOS on the
> other hand is supported out-of-the-box by most software.
On Mon, 9 May 2011 17:14:06 -0400
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday, May 09, 2011 04:45:36 PM Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Depends on what he is doing. BSDs tend to be far more mature than
> > any Linux. They are poor systems for desktops or anything like
> > that. They are heavily used as servers by man
On Monday, May 09, 2011 04:45:36 PM Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Depends on what he is doing. BSDs tend to be far more mature than any
> Linux. They are poor systems for desktops or anything like that. They
> are heavily used as servers by many vary large providers and as the
> basis for many products li
> Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 14:58:57 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Jay Ashworth
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Walter Vaughan"
>
> > You most definately will want to make sure your user id's are
> > identical between the two systems, otherwise stuff like @CB will have wrong
> > information.
>
Lori Jakab wrote:
following article for a collection of links why that's the case:
http://evilrouters.net/2011/04/11/its-time-to-move-on-from-centos/
That article perfectly illustrates why using or moving to debian makes a
lot of sense.
Greetings,
Jeroen
--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-
> *Any* of the BSDs are so much less well supported that they'll drive you
> straight up a wall.
>
If by "less supported" you mean that your local strip mall doesn't offer
a "BSD-certified-systems-engineer" class, then yeah .. but like anything
else, experience in the tricker stuff is going to
On 5/9/11 11:58 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Walter Vaughan"
>
>> You most definately will want to make sure your user id's are
>> identical between the two systems, otherwise stuff like @CB will have wrong
>> information.
>
> Excellent point.
>
>> Also, do
On 05/09/2011 08:58 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> CentOS and SuSE 11 are the only rational free Linuces for business use.
With the uncertainty surrounding the future of CentOS, it's not
something I would recommend for business use at the moment. See the
following article for a collection of links why
Original Message -
> From: "Brant I. Stevens"
> >CentOS and SuSE 11 are the only rational free Linuces for business
> >use.
>
> Don't forget Scientific Linux as well. Same heritage as CentOS.
"Scientific Linux? What's that?" :-)
And while there's probably nothing wrong with the OS o
- Original Message -
> From: "Walter Vaughan"
> You most definately will want to make sure your user id's are
> identical between the two systems, otherwise stuff like @CB will have wrong
> information.
Excellent point.
> Also, do you have any expertise maintaing a linux box? If you wa
10 matches
Mail list logo
