On 30/Oct/18 05:11, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Hello there
>
> I have been searching for CLS (Cable Landing Station) to CLS latency
> infirnation for submarine cables. I was able to identify only a
> handful of them via sales catalogs. I am still missing like 320~
> systems, does wnyone have this inf
channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------
> *From: *"Ben Cannon"
> *To: *"Mehmet Akcin"
> *Cc: *"nanog"
> *Sent: *Tuesday, October 30, 2018 2:59:48 AM
> *Subject: *Re: CLS to CLS Latency info
>
> I’d be ast
: "Ben Cannon"
To: "Mehmet Akcin"
Cc: "nanog"
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 2:59:48 AM
Subject: Re: CLS to CLS Latency info
I’d be astonished if they varied much from lightspeed.
-Ben
On Oct 29, 2018, at 8:11 PM, Mehmet Akcin < meh...@akcin.net >
Agreed. Actual ping would not work, if we're talking about unixy
system sending ping. Active devices increase latency in single digit
microsecond, the host latency is much much higher, so the ping results
would largely measure your host latency variation. You'd need NIC with
hardware timestamping t
I’d be astonished if they varied much from lightspeed.
-Ben
> On Oct 29, 2018, at 8:11 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>
> Hello there
>
> I have been searching for CLS (Cable Landing Station) to CLS latency
> infirnation for submarine cables. I was able to identify only a handful of
> them via sal
5 matches
Mail list logo