Re: CGNAT - Seeking Real World Experience

2016-11-26 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
I had given some numbers for PBA in http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2016-February/101908.html -- Tassos Adam wrote on 23/11/16 23:17: > I'm crunching the numbers on the cost effectiveness of implementing CGN vs > IPv4 auctions. The determining factor is how many ephemeral ports are >

Re: CGNAT - Seeking Real World Experience

2016-11-25 Thread Stepan Kucherenko
Don't try detereministic NAT, it's not worth it. You'll waste a lot of port capacity on most users, and it might still be problematic for power users. Just try to match one user to one real IP, many sites/applications don't like when there are several requests from one user with different IPs.

Re: CGNAT - Seeking Real World Experience

2016-11-24 Thread Ca By
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 7:05 PM Adam wrote: > I'm crunching the numbers on the cost effectiveness of implementing CGN vs > IPv4 auctions. The determining factor is how many ephemeral ports are > reserved for each customer. This is for a residential broadband > environment. > > Is anybody doing de