em of how to massively scale and keep up
the quality of your support services too.
-Kiriki
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Petach
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 1:13 PM
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Bluehost.com
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 8:1
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Bob Evans wrote:
> I think he means to say the rich get richer on the other side of the
> investment by playing the shorting and the buying of stock in the gambling
> marketplace. As the stock itself can create a new currency so they
> make more money playing w
I think he means to say the rich get richer on the other side of the
investment by playing the shorting and the buying of stock in the gambling
marketplace. As the stock itself can create a new currency so they
make more money playing with that than the actually investment. They are
on the insi
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Kiriki Delany wrote:
> [...]
>
> Bottom line, is the industry needs to be increasing value, because the flip
> side working for no profit, surviving off investment only... there's no
> end-game. You see this cycle time and time again as market share is grabbed,
try should be limited.
The giant pool of money is now weaponized.
-Kiriki
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Bob Evans
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 5:20 PM
To: Robert Webb
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Bluehost.com
For an ISP type service - it
; lose value for an industry should be limited.
>
> The giant pool of money is now weaponized.
>
> -Kiriki
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Bob Evans
> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 5:20 PM
> To: Ro
hi
On 11/25/15 at 05:19pm, Bob Evans wrote:
> For an ISP type service - it's almost impossible the make it up in volume
> - all you need is one phone call to cost you $10 in support on a $3.50
> service. With that many customers you can imagine how many call to just
> ask what happened or vent af
For an ISP type service - it's almost impossible the make it up in volume
- all you need is one phone call to cost you $10 in support on a $3.50
service. With that many customers you can imagine how many call to just
ask what happened or vent after the event is over.
I founded a cable modem busine
However, with thousands more users at that price point, you would think the
income would be plenty for better services.
Who makes more, the store with smaller quantities at higher prices or the
store that sells more bulk at lower prices? Perception of value, I believe,
wins.
Robert
On Wed,
Yes, I agree with you Joe - a hasty generalization, as "you get what you
pay for" doesn't really apply to as many goods in the same way it does to
almost all services. However, a $3.49 web site service should have be a
good first clue.
Thank You
Bob Evans
CTO
> Walmart has cheap prices so "yo
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:06:30 +1100, Matt Palmer said:
> Except for the fuckups that the redundancy *caused*...
You can't have split-brain failures if there isn't enough brain to split? :)
pgpYyCs8TIJTE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Walmart has cheap prices so "you get what you pay for."??
Hasty generalization but I can't disagree 100% with your opinion on this
one.
I am learning about the non-profit world of IT and the challenges are all
around me. :)
--
Later, Joe
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Bob Evans
wrote:
>
> Ge
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 02:24:05PM -0500, Andrew Kirch wrote:
> remember folks, redundancy is the savior of all f***ups.
Except for the fuckups that the redundancy *caused*...
- Matt
Gee, for $3.49 for a website hosting per month , it's a real bargain.
While the network person inside me says, Wow that's a long outage. The
other part of me is really wondering what one thinks they can really
expect from a company that hosts a website for just $3.49 ? Such a
bargain at less than
remember folks, redundancy is the savior of all f***ups.
:)
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:21 PM, JoeSox wrote:
> I just waited 160 minutes for a tech call and the Bluehost tech told me he
> was able to confirm that it wasn't malicious activity that took down the
> datacenter but rather it was cause
Forgot to mention that their ETA was by end of today. :facepalm:
--
Later, Joe
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:21 AM, JoeSox wrote:
> I just waited 160 minutes for a tech call and the Bluehost tech told me he
> was able to confirm that it wasn't malicious activity that took down the
> datacenter but
I just waited 160 minutes for a tech call and the Bluehost tech told me he
was able to confirm that it wasn't malicious activity that took down the
datacenter but rather it was caused by a "datacenter issue".
So my first thought is someone didn't design the topology correctly or
something.
Some of
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 08:41:55AM -0800,
JoeSox wrote
a message of 9 lines which said:
> Anyone have the scope on the outage for Bluehost?
> https://twitter.com/search?q=%23bluehostdown&src=tyah
The two name servers ns1.bluehost.com and ns2.bluehost.com are awfully
slow to respond:
% check-
Their site and my site work
US west coast
-Grant
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> On 11/25/15 9:41 AM, JoeSox wrote:
>
>> Anyone have the scope on the outage for Bluehost?
>> https://twitter.com/search?q=%23bluehostdown&src=tyah
>>
>> Cannot even move my DNS until its res
On 11/25/15 9:41 AM, JoeSox wrote:
Anyone have the scope on the outage for Bluehost?
https://twitter.com/search?q=%23bluehostdown&src=tyah
Cannot even move my DNS until its restored. :(
I suggest moving the status page to outside your network as well.
https://www.bluehost.com/hosting/serverstatu
21 matches
Mail list logo
