"George Bonser" writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bret Clark
>> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 7:08 AM
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: BGP multihoming question.
>>
>> On 12/10/2010 10:01 AM, Dylan Ebner wrote:
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bret Clark
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 7:08 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: BGP multihoming question.
>
> On 12/10/2010 10:01 AM, Dylan Ebner wrote:
> > 3. You cannot trust the second isp to advertise the SWIP block
On 12/10/2010 10:01 AM, Dylan Ebner wrote:
3. You cannot trust the second isp to advertise the SWIP block correctly if
they are not a tier 1. Even though they may advertise it for you to their
upstream, they don't always have the appropriate procedures in place to get the
LOAs to the upstream
Our organization does exactly this. The requirements we have run into are:
1. The block needs to be at least a /24 and registered with SWIP
2. You will need LOAs from the owner of the block. This used to take months to
get, now it seems the isps have streamlined this operation
3. You cannot trust
On 12/9/2010 5:32 AM, b2 wrote:
Hi , first sorry for lame question but i'm new to BGP.
In my ISP I have two full BGP sessions with my two transit providers (X
and Y), and for every provider i have assigned PA (Provider
Aggregatable) networks. Is it possible (if there are no filters on other
side)
2010/12/9 b2 :
> Hi , first sorry for lame question but i'm new to BGP.
> In my ISP I have two full BGP sessions with my two transit providers (X
> and Y), and for every provider i have assigned PA (Provider
> Aggregatable) networks. Is it possible (if there are no filters on other
> side) to adver
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:32:26 +0200
b2 wrote:
> Hi , first sorry for lame question but i'm new to BGP.
> In my ISP I have two full BGP sessions with my two transit providers
> (X and Y), and for every provider i have assigned PA (Provider
> Aggregatable) networks. Is it possible (if there are no f
7 matches
Mail list logo
