Re: BGP MVPN RFC6513, Section 10

2016-03-02 Thread Jason Iannone
Thanks for responding. What's interesting is that even though no listener joins to RP, one must be configured for PIM Sparse Mode ASM to function. I suppose this is a result of MVPN outsmarting PIM. In my testing so far, generating a working flow with rpt-spt is much faster than spt-only. I sus

Re: BGP MVPN RFC6513, Section 10

2016-02-28 Thread Mark Tinka
On 26/Feb/16 11:33, Yann Lejeune wrote: > > It's up to you to choose what mode you want to use: > - spt-only: is quite "simple". We only have (s,g) in the core. To validate > an os, it's faster. > - rpt-spt. We have both (*,g) and (s,g) in the core. the validation is more > complex, the protocol

Re: BGP MVPN RFC6513, Section 10

2016-02-26 Thread Yann Lejeune
Hi To support the section §10 in your conf you have two choices: a. (§10.1) implementing the RP on your PE (protocol pim rp local). It will advertises the route type after pim register message (or msdp source active from other RP is you have other rp in your network) + be sure to use spt-only m