Re: As path for Junos

2014-03-08 Thread Pedro Cavaca
On 8 March 2014 08:47, Saku Ytti wrote: > On (2014-03-07 19:44 +), Pedro Cavaca wrote: > > > Why wouldn't ".{3}" work, for this case? > > Because the OP wants a same atom N times, not any atom N times. > Of course, what was I thinking? I'll crawl back to my hole now... Thanks for being gentl

Re: As path for Junos

2014-03-08 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2014-03-07 19:44 +), Pedro Cavaca wrote: > Why wouldn't ".{3}" work, for this case? Because the OP wants a same atom N times, not any atom N times. -- ++ytti

Re: As path for Junos

2014-03-07 Thread Marco Paesani
Hi, thanks for all info but with my 11.4R7.5 I cannot implement the check. Regards, Marco 2014-03-07 20:47 GMT+01:00 Pedro Cavaca : > > > > On 7 March 2014 19:44, Pedro Cavaca wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 7 March 2014 19:26, Michael Loftis wrote: >> >>> >>> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/j

Re: As path for Junos

2014-03-07 Thread Pedro Cavaca
On 7 March 2014 19:44, Pedro Cavaca wrote: > > > > On 7 March 2014 19:26, Michael Loftis wrote: > >> >> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.3/topics/usage-guidelines/policy-configuring-as-path-regular-expressions-to-use-as-routing-policy-match-conditions.html >> >> There's no backref s

Re: As path for Junos

2014-03-07 Thread Pedro Cavaca
On 7 March 2014 19:26, Michael Loftis wrote: > > http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.3/topics/usage-guidelines/policy-configuring-as-path-regular-expressions-to-use-as-routing-policy-match-conditions.html > > There's no backref support in the regex subset that juniper has chosen > to im

Re: As path for Junos

2014-03-07 Thread Michael Loftis
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.3/topics/usage-guidelines/policy-configuring-as-path-regular-expressions-to-use-as-routing-policy-match-conditions.html There's no backref support in the regex subset that juniper has chosen to implement, see http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/ER_Det