On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:06:26AM -0800, Jay Hennigan wrote:
> What I don't like is that they only offer it as a cloud-based service.
One of the downsides of all such services is that the more successful
they are, the bigger a target they are. And they're a tempting target,
since successful pene
> What's the collective opinion here? Is anyone using them or a similar service?
> Are there non-cloud-based alternatives that are relatively easy to set up and
> manage? We've explored Zabbix, Nagios, MRTG and its various wrappers,
> and Intermapper. Anything else new on the horizon that has a GUI
Hi Jay,
I have experience with nagios and cacti, now I'm experimenting with logic
monitor and observium. The observium is a great tool to discover your
network devices but don't have great graphics and don't have any alarm
system, but you can get a lot of information about your network devices,
co
What's the collective opinion here? Is anyone using them or a similar
service? Are there non-cloud-based alternatives that are relatively
easy
to set up and manage? We've explored Zabbix, Nagios, MRTG and its
various wrappers, and Intermapper. Anything else new on the horizon
that
has a GUI
The value proposition of all cloud services is that you get instant technical
capability without building your own infrastructure. I see cloud NMS services
like LogicMonitor and Spiceworks as a good deal for small organizations without
their own IT people. But for all the reasons you give, the m
We have used LogicMonitor for a few years to monitor hundreds of network
devices with no reliability issues, at all. The agents have proven to be
lightweight and rather unobtrusive. I can’t recall a time where we have ever
had to intervene during regular operations or one of their upgrades.
We
6 matches
Mail list logo
