On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:10:16PM +0100, bas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Richard A Steenbergen
> wrote:
> > PR 836197
>
> That looks like a spanking new PR number to me.
> The highest PR number I found in 12.2 release notes was 82.
> Rather strange that they didn't ha
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
> PR 836197
That looks like a spanking new PR number to me.
The highest PR number I found in 12.2 release notes was 82.
Rather strange that they didn't have an earlier PR number, while the
issue has existed for such a long ti
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:45:10PM +0100, Tim Vollebregt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What we do nowadays as some workaround, is configuring a default route
> towards a core router on 8 x 10G before maintaining an MX box. Which
> will be installed before BGP sessions come up, this will cause some
> packet
o pull in a full internet table and begin
> handling traffic.
>
> Steven Naslund
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jensen Tyler [mailto:jty...@fiberutilities.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 9:45 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Krt queue iss
012 9:45 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Krt queue issues
Look into Static route retain. Should keep the route in the forwarding
table.
>From Jniper site
<<<
Route Retention
By default, static routes are not retained in the forwarding table when
the routing process shu
Jared Mauch
Cc: Saku Ytti; juniper-...@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Krt queue issues
Jared Mauch writes:
> As far as the fallback 'default' route, if you are purchasing transit
> from someone, you could consider a last-resort default pointed at
> them. You can exclude
6 matches
Mail list logo
