On 17/05/2008, at 5:53 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
> Nathan Ward wrote:
>> If the foreign AS really wants to send you routes that way, they
>> can do it regardless of how you stop your advertisements being
>> accepted by/ reaching them. We're hardly talking high security here.
>>
>> ip rout
Nathan Ward wrote:
> If the foreign AS really wants to send you routes that way, they can
> do it regardless of how you stop your advertisements being accepted by/
> reaching them. We're hardly talking high security here.
>
> ip route 1.1.1.1 works a treat.
>
I'm not quite sure of your po
On 17/05/2008, at 5:30 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
>> If you really need to, you can get a similar effect by using
>> ASPATH poisoning; just prepend your AS paths with the ASes you
>> don't want those prefixes hitting.
>>
>> ..
>> Nothing really about how it works in a MLPA IXP though.
>>
> If you really need to, you can get a similar effect by using ASPATH
> poisoning; just prepend your AS paths with the ASes you don't want
> those prefixes hitting.
>
> ..
>
> Nothing really about how it works in a MLPA IXP though.
>
It'd work, but it's a pretty evil thing to do and it's
On 17/05/2008, at 5:05 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
> Some MLPAs give you some control over routing (eg. don't send my
> prefixes to AS), but a lot don't.
If you really need to, you can get a similar effect by using ASPATH
poisoning; just prepend your AS paths with the ASes you don't want
Kai Chen wrote:
>
>> There is the model where all partcipants peer through agency of 3rd party.
>> That tends to be looked on as an extremely bad idea, but some regulatory
>> environments encourage or enforce that sort of behavior particularly around
>> the monopoly PTT.
>>
>
>
> I don't know
On 17/05/2008, at 3:52 AM, Kai Chen wrote:
> Sure, two ASs may peer with each other at multiple locations, I do
> want to
> know in each of these peering location, if there exist multi-access
> between
> these two ASes.
If you're looking for some rules about how this must work, you won't
fi
2008/5/16 Joel Jaeggli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Kai Chen wrote:
>
>> Hi, here is a quick question.
>> 1. Beside public peering in IXP and private peering between two dedicated
>> ASes, are there any other interconnection models in the current Internet?
>>
>
> There is the model where all partcipants
Kai Chen wrote:
> Hi, here is a quick question.
> 1. Beside public peering in IXP and private peering between two dedicated
> ASes, are there any other interconnection models in the current Internet?
There is the model where all partcipants peer through agency of 3rd
party. That tends to be looke
9 matches
Mail list logo
