> There's new mib support in new IOS's and ASR9k stuffs but there's
> still not feature parity with IPv4. It seems the current prevailing
> winds indicate less support for SNMP and more for NETCONF. So maybe
> we should all get cozy with XML rather than OIDs...
All I've seen of Netconf so far
riginal-
> De: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org]
> Enviado el: jueves, 19 de abril de 2012 10:24
> Para: Carlos Asensio
> CC: nanog@nanog.org
> Asunto: Re: [IPv6] Monitoring BGP IPv6 Sesions
>
> On 19/04/2012 09:58, Carlos Asensio wrote:
>> Anyone can help us on tha
19 de abril de 2012 10:24
Para: Carlos Asensio
CC: nanog@nanog.org
Asunto: Re: [IPv6] Monitoring BGP IPv6 Sesions
On 19/04/2012 09:58, Carlos Asensio wrote:
> Anyone can help us on that matter?
We need BGP4MIBv2. We've needed it for years.
I am tired of screen-scraping terminal sessions loo
> On 19/04/2012 09:58, Carlos Asensio wrote:
>> Anyone can help us on that matter?
>
> We need BGP4MIBv2. We've needed it for years.
>
> I am tired of screen-scraping terminal sessions looking for signs that ipv6
> sessions are down or broken.
+1
Sander
On 19/04/2012 09:58, Carlos Asensio wrote:
> Anyone can help us on that matter?
We need BGP4MIBv2. We've needed it for years.
I am tired of screen-scraping terminal sessions looking for signs that ipv6
sessions are down or broken.
Nick
5 matches
Mail list logo