On 12/3/10 1:05 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams
wrote:
there exists a free speech application for fast flux hosting networks, and
its in connecticut, not china.
(during the icann gnso pdp on fast flux hosting the above assertion was
generall
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams
wrote:
> there exists a free speech application for fast flux hosting networks, and
> its in connecticut, not china.
>
> (during the icann gnso pdp on fast flux hosting the above assertion was
> generally dismissed)
'fast flux hosting' == akam
there exists a free speech application for fast flux hosting networks,
and its in connecticut, not china.
(during the icann gnso pdp on fast flux hosting the above assertion
was generally dismissed)
-e
On 12/3/10 12:41 PM, Zaid Ali wrote:
I see a new T-Shirt "Free speech has an IP address"
> I see a new T-Shirt "Free speech has an IP address"
on the front, and on the back "DDOS me Senator if you can"
-J
I see a new T-Shirt "Free speech has an IP address"
Zaid
On 12/3/10 8:38 AM, "// ravi" wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>>> and this is based on what facts?
>>
>> Instead of tweeting about how to reach their content, or their IP
>> addresses to bypass DNS [snip happens
On Dec 3, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>> and this is based on what facts?
>
> Instead of tweeting about how to reach their content, or their IP
> addresses to bypass DNS [snip happens]
http://twitter.com/#!/wikileaks/status/10621245489938433
7 hours ago
(Randy, I plan/hope to requote
> 'they' is a multicast address ... dyn/everydns or wikileaks? which is
> the 'they' that is doing the twittering?
wikileaks. seems that they (wikileaks) got the message, following
tweets included their IP address and the new .ch domain.
The current IP address for the cablegate stuff is 213.251.1
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>> and this is based on what facts?
>
> Instead of tweeting about how to reach their content, or their IP
'they' is a multicast address ... dyn/everydns or wikileaks? which is
the 'they' that is doing the twittering?
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 04:27:10PM -0500, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> Wikileaks has been booted off Amazon EC2
>
> http://arstechnica.com/security/news/2010/12/wikileaks-kicked-out-of-amazons-cloud.ars
>
> "Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT), chairman of the Homeland Security and
> Governmental Affairs
On Dec 3, 2010, at 1:11 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>> So, is this the end of the wikileaks? :)
>
> Hardly, IMHO it is a gambit to ask for money.
>
> Craig, don't you guys at Arbor have the IP addresses that were
> tracking for the DDOS attacks ?
>
http://46.59.1.2 seems to work.
Regards
Marshal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>> But Jorge has a point. If they wanted to help users get past their DNS
>> problems, they could tweet for assistance, tweet their IP addy and ask
>> to be re-tweeted, ask owners of authorities t
> But Jorge has a point. If they wanted to help users get past their DNS
> problems, they could tweet for assistance, tweet their IP addy and ask to be
> re-tweeted, ask owners of authorities to set up wikileaks.$FOO.com to 'crowd
> source' their name, etc.
I'll just point to an article I foun
On Dec 3, 2010, at 1:20 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> and this is based on what facts?
>> Instead of tweeting about how to reach their content, or their IP
>> addresses to bypass DNS, they are sending repetedly via twitter the
>> following URL http://collateralmurder.com/en/support.html
>
> coinciden
>> and this is based on what facts?
> Instead of tweeting about how to reach their content, or their IP
> addresses to bypass DNS, they are sending repetedly via twitter the
> following URL http://collateralmurder.com/en/support.html
coincidence != causality
> and this is based on what facts?
Instead of tweeting about how to reach their content, or their IP
addresses to bypass DNS, they are sending repetedly via twitter the
following URL http://collateralmurder.com/en/support.html
-J
> IMHO it is a gambit to ask for money.
and this is based on what facts? when this kind of stuff goes down, we
need to pay a bit of attention to actual authenticable fact and not
indulge in too much conjecturbation.
randy
> Message from twitter @wikileaks:
> WikiLeaks,org domain killed by US everydns.net after claimed mass
> attacks.
as someone who has done a lot of tunneling, uucping, funny routing
relays, ... for democratic movements in lots of countries, i am not
pleased at seeing the need arise in the so-called
> So, is this the end of the wikileaks? :)
Hardly, IMHO it is a gambit to ask for money.
Craig, don't you guys at Arbor have the IP addresses that were
tracking for the DDOS attacks ?
-J
Message from twitter @wikileaks:
WikiLeaks,org domain killed by US everydns.net after claimed mass attacks.
So, is this the end of the wikileaks? :)
--
Sincerely,
Mikhail Strizhov
On 12/01/2010 06:50 PM, Craig Labovitz wrote:
http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2010/11/wikileaks-cablegate-attac
http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2010/11/wikileaks-cablegate-attack/
and http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2010/11/round2-ddos-versus-wikileaks/
- Craig
On Dec 1, 2010, at 4:38 PM, Mike wrote:
> Just on an operational front, does anyone know the nature of the DDoS against
> wikileaks? eg: spoofed s
Just on an operational front, does anyone know the nature of the DDoS
against wikileaks? eg: spoofed source garbage, http get, synfloods, or ?
Mike-
On Nov 30, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations
>> state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has
>> left?
>>
>> randy
>>
>>
>
> That wa
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:18:18PM -0500, Andrew Kirch said:
>Lets be clear here, I'm not encouraging DDoS, I'm enjoying the
>possibility that someone will hopefully put a jacketed hollowpoint in
>Assange.
Not to promote equine defibrilation, but just so you all feel better -
http://www.mi
On Nov 28, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations
> state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has
> left?
>
> randy
>
>
That was two days ago - as of this morning, there is apparently another
From @w
The one thing I found interesting was the InfoSecIsland poll where the majority
of Security Practitioners polled actually supported the Jester's methods...
Stefan Fouant
Sorry for the top post. Sent from my iPad
On Nov 28, 2010, at 9:29 PM, "andrew.wallace"
wrote:
> Hi Nanog,
>
>
> Some m
Yes, we've all read your "blog".
Good thing this isn't an operations list or anything.
-wil
On Nov 28, 2010, at 8:06 PM, Andrew Kirch wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 10:52 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010, Ken Chase wrote:
>>
>>> This is always the best way to deal with disagreement.
On 11/28/2010 10:52 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010, Ken Chase wrote:
>
>> This is always the best way to deal with disagreement.
>>
>> But I think this is the wrong list to tender such contracts. Also, it's odd
>> you
>> hate DDOS's more than murder. Time to take some time off work
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010, Ken Chase wrote:
> This is always the best way to deal with disagreement.
>
> But I think this is the wrong list to tender such contracts. Also, it's odd
> you
> hate DDOS's more than murder. Time to take some time off work perhaps?
>
> For the first time I'm hoping to not
ROFL
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 28, 2010, at 10:23 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:18:18PM -0500, Andrew Kirch said:
>
>> Lets be clear here, I'm not encouraging DDoS, I'm enjoying the
>> possibility that someone will hopefully put a jacketed hollowpoint in
>> Assange.
>>
>>
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:18:18PM -0500, Andrew Kirch said:
>Lets be clear here, I'm not encouraging DDoS, I'm enjoying the
>possibility that someone will hopefully put a jacketed hollowpoint in
>Assange.
>
>Andrew
This is always the best way to deal with disagreement.
But I think thi
On 11/28/2010 6:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> I find it distressing when Network Operators are willing to encourage
> DDoS'ing of a site. Any site. Especially on an operational list, where
> politics are specifically prohibited.
>
> You don't like Wikileaks, that's between you & Julian. A
Hi Nanog,
Some more information here -
http://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/ecwnn/wikileaks_hacked_ahead_of_secret_us_document/c176lcb
The hacker has featured previously in a news article on his attack platform -
https://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/3258-Hacker-Releases-Second-Video-of-E
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:06:08 -0500
"kmedc...@dessus.com" wrote:
> >> botnets. Sun Nov 16 - 15:28 EST
>
> >That would be just about 2 weeks ago.
>
> Actually, the last time November 16th fell on a Sunday would have been in
> 2008.
>
> So fifty-four weeks ago ...
Um, really? What year is this?
On 29/11/10 1:06 PM, kmedc...@dessus.com wrote:
>> Uh... huh?
>
>>> Just so we are all straight and clear - wikileaks hit is not a
>>> 'Distributed' DoS, its a simple DoS - I dont use intermediaries or
>>> botnets. Sun Nov 16 - 15:28 EST
>
>> That would be just about 2 weeks ago.
>
> Actually, t
I copied and pasted that from another list, however, when I brought up the
twitter feed it said "six hours ago" (when i sent that first email).
Now I don't see the tweet.
So, the truth may vary.
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 28, 2010, at 9:06 PM, "kmedc...@dessus.com" wrote:
>> Uh... huh?
>
>
>Uh... huh?
>> Just so we are all straight and clear - wikileaks hit is not a
>> 'Distributed' DoS, its a simple DoS - I dont use intermediaries or
>> botnets. Sun Nov 16 - 15:28 EST
>That would be just about 2 weeks ago.
Actually, the last time November 16th fell on a Sunday would have been in
Uh... huh?
> Just so we are all straight and clear - wikileaks hit is not a
> 'Distributed' DoS, its a simple DoS - I dont use intermediaries or
> botnets. Sun Nov 16 - 15:28 EST
That would be just about 2 weeks ago.
I've heard it's a DOS (not DDOS) according to twitter. Allegedly according to
the person doing the DOS:
Just so we are all straight and clear - wikileaks hit is not a
'Distributed' DoS, its a simple DoS - I dont use intermediaries or
botnets. Sun Nov 16 - 15:28 EST
http://twitter.com/th3j35t3r
On Nov 28, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Andrew Kirch wrote:
On 11/28/2010 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations
state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has
left?
Good riddance. The sooner someone gives Julian Assange 2
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 06:27:13PM -0500, James Jones wrote:
> Remember not everyone who is on this list is a network operator
> and sometimes their misguided statements make it here.
It is an operations list; stick to the topic [reachabinility and
the fragmentation of dns or bgp data in this ca
What is the MLC position on threatening the lives of political adversaries via
the list? At least he didn't swear, I guess. That would be wrong.
"Andrew Kirch" wrote:
>On 11/28/2010 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations
>> state lev
On Nov 28, 2010, at 6:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Andrew Kirch wrote:
>> On 11/28/2010 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations
>>> state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has
On Nov 28, 2010, at 5:19 PM, Wil Schultz wrote:
> DOS is probably because they released some more stuff.
>
> "Secret US Embassy Cables"
> http://cablegate.wikileaks.org/
>
DDOS according to this
http://www.securityweek.com/wikileaks-under-denial-service-attack-ddos
Regards
Marshall
> -wil
>
Didn't took long for Wired to include the "cyberatack" theme on their
recent related article.
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/11/cablegate/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+wired/index+(Wired:+Index+3+(Top+Stories+2))
-J
Remember not everyone who is on this list is a network operator and sometimes
their misguided statements make it here. Do not get me wrong I wish wikileaks
would disappear, but there are better ways to do this than interfering with
other peoples networks. I would hope the moderators are willi
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Andrew Kirch wrote:
>> On 11/28/2010 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations
>>> state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse
On Nov 28, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Andrew Kirch wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations
>> state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has
>> left?
> Good riddance. The sooner someone gives Julian A
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:46:25 EST, Andrew Kirch said:
> On 11/28/2010 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations
> > state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has
> > left?
> >
> > randy
> >
> Good riddance. The soone
Seems like they moved to Amazon a few hours ago:
$ whois -h whois.bgpmon.net wikileaks.org
Prefix: 46.51.128.0/18
Prefix description: Amazon EU AWS Dublin
Country code:IE
Origin AS: 39111
Origin AS Name: ADSI-AS Amazon EU DC AS
.-- My secret spy satellite i
DOS is probably because they released some more stuff.
"Secret US Embassy Cables"
http://cablegate.wikileaks.org/
-wil
On Nov 28, 2010, at 1:38 PM, James Downs wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 17:07 -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> I wouldn't have thought that PRQ would have any significant protection in
> place.
They used to host thepiratebay. I would figure that site probably got a
lot of ddos attacks...
William
I wouldn't have thought that PRQ would have any significant protection in place.
Jeff
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:03 PM, William Pitcock
wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 16:43 -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
>> I'm surprised it took this long for the DDoS train to pull into the station.
>
> Wikileaks ge
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 16:43 -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> I'm surprised it took this long for the DDoS train to pull into the station.
Wikileaks gets DDoSed all the time. My understanding is that PRQ
nullrouted the IP because the DDoS is much larger this time.
William
better late than never
--
Sent from my Nokia N900 using Nokia Messaging
- Original message -
> I'm surprised it took this long for the DDoS train to pull into the
> station.
>
> Jeff
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 4:38 PM, James Downs wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 28, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Randy Bush
On 11/28/2010 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations
> state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has
> left?
>
> randy
>
Good riddance. The sooner someone gives Julian Assange 230gr of shut
the f*** up, the better.
I'm surprised it took this long for the DDoS train to pull into the station.
Jeff
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 4:38 PM, James Downs wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations
>> state level censors trying to clo
My guess would be that it is busy. Don't know bout your region but au way it
has been on the news a bit.
M
On 29/11/2010, at 8:35, "Randy Bush" wrote:
> anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations
> state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse h
I heard there are DDoS attacks on the Wikileaks site.
Zaid
On 11/28/10 1:34 PM, "Randy Bush" wrote:
> anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations
> state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has
> left?
>
> randy
>
On Nov 28, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations
state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has
Reported they were under attack: http://bgg.lv/h2pmsd
They twittered earlier claiming ddos.
http://twitter.com/#!/wikileaks/status/8920530488926208
"We are currently under a mass distributed denial of service attack."
horse firmly bolted though, The Guardian, NYT etc all have copies apparently.
thanks
Andrew
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Ran
60 matches
Mail list logo
