will work EVEN if you
don't support IPv6 in your network, so it will show if some transition
traffic is passing thru.
Regards,
Jordi
> De: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Responder a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Fecha: Wed, 30 May 2007 12:41:17 +0100
> Para:
> Conversación: why
On 30-mei-2007, at 13:23, Nathan Ward wrote:
I can't seem to reach www.ietf.org over IPv6 these days and I have
to wait 10 seconds before I fall back to IPv4.
What browser are you using that falls back? Does it require hints
(ie. unreachables, or similar) or does a timeout in TCP session
On 30/05/2007, at 11:41 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before someone starts it, the debate between transition
protocols to use is well and truely over. Teredo and 6to4
have been chosen for use by the software vendors of the end
systems. (fine by me)
This is misleading. You are using IPv6 j
> Before someone starts it, the debate between transition
> protocols to use is well and truely over. Teredo and 6to4
> have been chosen for use by the software vendors of the end
> systems. (fine by me)
This is misleading. You are using IPv6 jargon (transition protocol)
whose meaning is not o
On 30/05/2007, at 8:00 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
I can't seem to reach www.ietf.org over IPv6 these days and I have
to wait 10 seconds before I fall back to IPv4.
What browser are you using that falls back? Does it require hints
(ie. unreachables, or similar) or does a timeout in TCP
On 29-mei-2007, at 21:53, David Conrad wrote:
We have tried to overlay the same transport and presentation layer
onto a new network layer, but have not engineered the new network
layer to facilitate this. We have new APIs and new naming
attributes, requiring applications to do the heavy l
Ed,
On May 29, 2007, at 12:11 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:
If you want to read Dilbert on-line and I tell you that it is
available at a certain URL, would you rather I give you "http://
www.dilbert.com" or that I send you "if you use IPv4 then http://
www.dilbert.com" else if you use IPv6 then ht
At 12:01 -0700 5/29/07, David Conrad wrote:
What a horrible idea. Applications automatically pre- or appending crap to
domain name labels shouldn't be done, period.
I won't argue that, but it happens.
And I do make use of it. When I am back from a trip I type in
"dilbert" and see the comi
Ed,
On May 29, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Edward Lewis wrote:
First - "the way you ask for names" is not different at the
application level, it is different in the "layer" in which you find
where to shoot packets.
Right. The problem is, the methodology by which you shoot packets
may or may not w
9 matches
Mail list logo
