Re: ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might have

2017-11-27 Thread Rafael Ganascim
Em 22 de nov de 2017 3:53 PM, "Aaron Gould" escreveu: This is a *single area* ospf environment, that has been stable for years.. But now suddenly is having issues with new ospf neightbor adjacencies , which are riding a 3rd party transport network Anyone ever experienced anything strange with

RE: ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might have

2017-11-27 Thread Scott Weeks
--- nanog@nanog.org wrote: From: Richard Vander Reyden via NANOG > This is a *single area* ospf environment, that has been > stable for years. But now suddenly is having issues with > new ospf neightbor adjacencies , which are riding a 3rd > party transport network >> I have seen this in t

RE: ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might have

2017-11-27 Thread Richard Vander Reyden via NANOG
> This is a *single area* ospf environment, that has been stable for years. > But now suddenly is having issues with new ospf neightbor adjacencies , which > are riding a 3rd party transport network I have seen this in the lab before, was related to the size of the LSA. > Anyone ever experienc

Re: ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might have

2017-11-22 Thread Jay Hennigan
On 11/22/17 9:51 AM, Aaron Gould wrote: This is a *single area* ospf environment, that has been stable for years.. But now suddenly is having issues with new ospf neightbor adjacencies , which are riding a 3rd party transport network Anyone ever experienced anything strange with underlying trans