On 2 Sep 2010, at 8:20 PM, lorddoskias wrote:
> I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number of
> routers) out there?
I have seen (as a consultant, not operator) a production SP network that had
over 800 routers in the backbone area. The LSDB was rather small as the net
On Sep 2, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 02/09/2010 13:20, lorddoskias wrote:
I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of
number of
routers) out there?
You don't expect anyone to actually admit to something like this? :-)
Of course I do -- 'tis much for your
In a message written on Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 09:40:39PM -0400, Christian Martin
wrote:
> The most interesting point to make, however, is how much legacy
> thinking in this area continues to be stranded in a rut that emerged
> 15 years ago. It is not uncommon to hear network folks cringe at
> the
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0300, lorddoskias
> wrote:
>> I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number
>> of routers) out there?
>
> I'll admit to having seen a network with over 400 device
On Sep 2, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> The stability of the topology plays a most prominent role, but it
>> wouldn't surprise me if a OSPF network largely comprised of router
>> LSAs (no redistribution), using today's hardware, could easily scale
>> to 1000 nodes in an area.
>
> i be
> The stability of the topology plays a most prominent role, but it
> wouldn't surprise me if a OSPF network largely comprised of router
> LSAs (no redistribution), using today's hardware, could easily scale
> to 1000 nodes in an area.
i believe the original poster asked about actual operating dep
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:20:05 +0300
lorddoskias wrote:
> I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number
> of routers) out there?
>
Presuming OSPF and IS-IS SPF costs are fairly similar, the following
page from "The complete IS-IS routing protocol" (really quite a good
bo
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 05:32:30PM -0400, Deepak Jain wrote:
> > > With respect to these OSPF questions, how many people are running two
> > OSPF processes on each router (v4 and v6) to support dual stack rather
> > than migrating (or just enjoying their existing) ISIS (OSI)
> > implementations?
>
.
> >
> > With respect to these OSPF questions, how many people are running two
> OSPF processes on each router (v4 and v6) to support dual stack rather
> than migrating (or just enjoying their existing) ISIS (OSI)
> implementations?
> >
> You left out the option of using ospf3 to do both v4 and v6
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 3, 2010, at 3:42 AM, Deepak Jain wrote:
>> Subject: Re: largest OSPF core
>>
>> On 02/09/2010 13:20, lorddoskias wrote:
>>> I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number
>> of
>>> routers) out th
> In a message written on Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0300, lorddoskias
> wrote:
>> I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number
>> of routers) out there?
The stability of the topology plays a most prominent role, but it wouldn't
surprise me if a OSPF network large
I think it is really depending on how your network topology looks like.
If you have top-down design with star topology to limit the network
connections to individual routers, it may scale well.
But if you connect every routers to each other such as full-mesh, it
will be a problem during interface f
In a message written on Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0300, lorddoskias
wrote:
> I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number
> of routers) out there?
I'll admit to having seen a network with over 400 devices in an
OSPF area 0, didn't design it, and in the end didn't
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:12:38 EDT, Deepak Jain said:
> "Dual routing is intended to be more of a long-term solution because there
> will be very few pure OSI or TCP/IP routing environments in the future."
Well, they were half-right. ;)
pgpjIdWlsKA38.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> Subject: Re: largest OSPF core
>
> On 02/09/2010 13:20, lorddoskias wrote:
> > I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number
> of
> > routers) out there?
>
> You don't expect anyone to actually admit to something like this? :-)
&g
On 02/09/2010 13:20, lorddoskias wrote:
> I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number of
> routers) out there?
You don't expect anyone to actually admit to something like this? :-)
Nick
16 matches
Mail list logo
